Engineering services · Texas

Wood Group USA Inc (Wood Plc) - Projects - Process Chemicals

Houston, TX · ~1,012 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wood Group USA Inc (Wood Plc) - Projects - Process Chemicals runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Engineering services workplace, earning a grade C.

Wood Group USA Inc (Wood Plc) - Projects - Process Chemicals: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Engineering services BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wood Group USA Inc (Wood Plc) - Projects - Process Chemicals safety composite

Wood Group USA Inc (Wood Plc) - Projects - Process Chemicals scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Wood Group USA Inc (Wood Plc) - Projects - Process Chemicals held a steady TCR band

Wood Group USA Inc (Wood Plc) - Projects - Process Chemicals's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.0 TCR.

2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541330 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/62
  • PHOTO Burrow Global Servic…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~1,012 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Burrow Global Services, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Wood Group USA Inc (Wood Plc) - Projects - Process Chemicals in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wood Group USA Inc (Wood Plc) - Projects - Process Chemicals averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Engineering services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wood Group USA Inc (Wood Plc) - Projects - Process Chemicals TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 0.5

Where Wood Group USA Inc (Wood Plc) - Projects - Process Chemicals falls in its industry

690 Engineering services establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 62 Engineering services employers in Texas.

Wood Group USA Inc (Wood Plc) - Projects - Process Chemicals (1,012 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Wood Group USA Inc (Wood Plc) - Projects - Process Chemicals
Wood Group USA Inc (Wood Plc) - Projects - Process Chemicals (1,012 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 0.9

Wood Group USA Inc (Wood Plc) - Projects - Process Chemicals has more employees than the Engineering services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541330 · TX · Houston

690 Engineering services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Burrow Global Services, LLC 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Compass WH 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR WHQ Campus 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lincolnshire 0.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE AUSCX0UPS AUS - UPS 1,011 FTE
STATE-SIZE CCC Group, Inc. 1,014 FTE
STATE-SIZE VT San Antonio Aerospace, Inc. 1,009 FTE
STATE-SIZE HCA Houston Conroe 1,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Keller Warehouse 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Carbro Constructors Corp Main 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1655 3rd St,San Francisco (MB3 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Integration Appliance Inc. 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nemacolin 1,012 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tri-Star Skyline Medical Center 1,012 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thomas Hospital 1,012 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amzl : Dch4 1,012 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.