Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Ohio

Woodbine Assembly Test

Ravenna, OH · ~38 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Woodbine Assembly Test runs at 13% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Woodbine Assembly Test: 0.4 TCR = 13% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Woodbine Assembly Test safety composite

Woodbine Assembly Test scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Woodbine Assembly Test: 0.0 → 2.7 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 2.7 TCR · DART/TCR 6.05× in 2023

Woodbine Assembly Test's TCR rose 2.7 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 6.05× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Ravenna, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 13% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #8/37
  • PHOTO Aerospace : Avon
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aerospace : Avon (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Woodbine Assembly Test in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Woodbine Assembly Test averages 0.4 TCR (13% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Woodbine Assembly Test TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Woodbine Assembly Test falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 37 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Ohio.

Woodbine Assembly Test (38 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Woodbine Assembly Test
Woodbine Assembly Test (38 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Woodbine Assembly Test has fewer employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · OH · Ravenna

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 61 employers in Ravenna, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aerospace : Avon 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goodrich Sensors and Integrated Systems Vergennes VT 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goodrich Corporation (Pueblo CO) 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR BE Aerospace - Westminster 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Verano OH CPG - Mothers Grow Best 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Green Velvet Sod Farms 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pride Transportation Co, Inc 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Union City 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Portage Medical Center 1,064 FTE
CITY-NEAR Family & Community Services, Inc. 568 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fluid Connectors : Ravenna 309 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2506 300 FTE
NAT-TCR General Aluminum / Fremont Division / Diecast 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Baze Chemical - Palestine 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Jamestown Container Corporation, Buffalo Division 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR J.C. Dillon, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Plant 29 Precast 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shin-Etsu Silicones of America 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tiarco Chemical (Dalton) 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blackhawk Professional Construction Services, Inc. 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.