Mall property operation (i.e., not operating contained businesses) rental or leasing · New York

Woodbury Common Premium Outlets

Central Valley, NY · ~25 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Woodbury Common Premium Outlets runs at 214% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Mall property operation (i.e., not operating contained businesses) rental or leasing workplace, earning a grade F.

Woodbury Common Premium Outlets: 3.0 TCR = 214% of Mall property operation (i.e., not operating contained businesses) rental or leasing BLS 1.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Woodbury Common Premium Outlets safety composite

Woodbury Common Premium Outlets scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2016→2024

Woodbury Common Premium Outlets injury rate improved

Woodbury Common Premium Outlets's TCR fell 3.0 from 3.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 12.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.0 · 2017=12.0 · 2018=3.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531120 · Central Valley, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.0 · 214% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #19/43
  • PHOTO Buncher
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Buncher (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Woodbury Common Premium Outlets in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Woodbury Common Premium Outlets averages 3.0 TCR (214% of the Mall property operation (i.e., not operating contained businesses) rental or leasing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Woodbury Common Premium Outlets TCR series: 2016=3 · 2017=12 · 2018=3 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.4

Where Woodbury Common Premium Outlets falls in its industry

302 Mall property operation (i.e., establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 43 Mall property operation (i.e., employers in New York.

Woodbury Common Premium Outlets (25 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Woodbury Common Premium Outlets
Woodbury Common Premium Outlets (25 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Woodbury Common Premium Outlets has fewer employees than the Mall property operation (i.e., not opera median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2017 12.0 3.0 4 0 0
2016 3.0 3.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531120 · NY · Central Valley

302 Mall property operation (i.e., not operating contained businesses) rental or leasing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 7 employers in Central Valley, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Buncher 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 59141198--1633 Broadway - Base 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR South Shore Plaza 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Los Angeles 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Atlantic Nurseries, Inc. 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE 242 Madava New York 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenwood dairy Farm LLC 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scipio Springs Dairy 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR 709 - Central Valley 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR 587 - Woodbury-NY 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR 36-204629277-2018 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR 709 709 Central Valley 33 FTE
NAT-TCR Carol Stream 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Gemini Industries 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Senior Solutions At Home Inc 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Alpha Nursery Inc 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cooper Machine Co., Inc. 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE InterBay Building Services Inc. 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE H-O Products 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paola Service Center 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.