Flower bulb growing · Oregon

Wooden Shoe Bulb Co dba Wooden Shoe Tulip Farm

Woodburn, OR · ~33 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wooden Shoe Bulb Co dba Wooden Shoe Tulip Farm runs at 51% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Flower bulb growing workplace, earning a grade B.

Wooden Shoe Bulb Co dba Wooden Shoe Tulip Farm: 2.3 TCR = 51% of Flower bulb growing BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wooden Shoe Bulb Co dba Wooden Shoe Tulip Farm safety composite

Wooden Shoe Bulb Co dba Wooden Shoe Tulip Farm scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Wooden Shoe Bulb Co dba Wooden Shoe Tulip Farm held a steady TCR band

Wooden Shoe Bulb Co dba Wooden Shoe Tulip Farm's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 11.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=11.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111421 · Woodburn, OR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 51% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/46
  • PHOTO Blooming Nursery
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Blooming Nursery (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Wooden Shoe Bulb Co dba Wooden Shoe Tulip Farm in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wooden Shoe Bulb Co dba Wooden Shoe Tulip Farm averages 2.3 TCR (51% of the Flower bulb growing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wooden Shoe Bulb Co dba Wooden Shoe Tulip Farm TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=11.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Wooden Shoe Bulb Co dba Wooden Shoe Tulip Farm falls in its industry

386 Flower bulb growing establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 46 Flower bulb growing employers in Oregon.

Wooden Shoe Bulb Co dba Wooden Shoe Tulip Farm (33 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 4.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Wooden Shoe Bulb Co dba Wooden Shoe Tulip Farm
Wooden Shoe Bulb Co dba Wooden Shoe Tulip Farm (33 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 4.9

Wooden Shoe Bulb Co dba Wooden Shoe Tulip Farm has fewer employees than the Flower bulb growing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 11.5 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111421 · OR · Woodburn

386 Flower bulb growing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 76 employers in Woodburn, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Blooming Nursery 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Source MO 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cracon, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Michael J. Cavaletto Ranches, LLC 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE OR-Central/Exley 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE OR-Parkrose 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sharpcor, Inc. - Oregon 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hyatt Regency Hotel Oregon Convention Center Hotel 14050005 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Woodburn DC #092 510 FTE
CITY-NEAR US Foods Portland 486 FTE
CITY-NEAR MacLaren 468 FTE
CITY-NEAR WOODBURN - D/C #092 454 FTE
NAT-TCR Brewers Supply Group - West Warwick RI 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Electric Coating Technologies 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR The Boldt Company - OK 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Caprock Home Health Services, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE SureScan Corporation 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE R.Brothers Waterproofing, Inc 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paradigm Construction 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prospect International Airport Services CLE 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.