Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Arkansas

Woodland Heights

Little Rock, AR · ~76 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Woodland Heights runs at 261% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Woodland Heights: 9.9 TCR = 261% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Woodland Heights safety composite

Woodland Heights scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Woodland Heights: 2.7 → 10.1 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 51.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.88× in 2023

Woodland Heights's TCR rose 7.4 from 2.7 in 2016 to 10.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 51.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Little Rock, AR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.9 · 261% of ind

  • DART 8.7 DART
  • RANK #45/51
  • PHOTO The Forum at Park Lane
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~76 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Forum at Park Lane (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Woodland Heights in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Woodland Heights averages 9.9 TCR (261% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Woodland Heights TCR series: 2016=2.7 · 2019=9.1 · 2020=7.4 · 2021=20.2 · 2022=51.4 · 2023=10.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Woodland Heights falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #45 safest of 51 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arkansas.

Woodland Heights (76 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Woodland Heights
Woodland Heights (76 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Woodland Heights has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 10.1 8.7 1 6 0
2022 51.4 49.6 1 29 0
2021 20.2 15.2 2 10 0
2020 7.4 3.7 3 1 0
2019 9.1 3.9 7 0 0
2016 2.7 0.0 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AR · Little Rock

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 446 employers in Little Rock, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Forum at Park Lane 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10482 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hillcrest Silver Ridge 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Palms at Ponte Vedre Assisted Living and Memory Care 9.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE BHGAR - Fayetteville Borick Dr (AR007) 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Drumline 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Automated Conveyor Systems Incorporated 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE SPF America LLC 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arkansas Children's Hospital 3,946 FTE
CITY-NEAR LITCX0UPS LIT - UPS 3,415 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - LIT1 2,510 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health Medical Center - Little Rock 2,500 FTE
NAT-TCR RK-054-Circleville ( RK-054 ) 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR USM Store #917 (ALBERTSONS MARKET) 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Eby-Brown Eau Claire 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 0123 9.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vail Place 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wesleyan Market Place* 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mittera - Arlington 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Southeast : SVC-Birmingham AL-USA 76 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.