Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Ohio

Woodlands Assisted Living

Columbus, OH · ~69 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Woodlands Assisted Living runs at 169% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Woodlands Assisted Living: 6.4 TCR = 169% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Woodlands Assisted Living safety composite

Woodlands Assisted Living scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Woodlands Assisted Living: 6.4 → 11.5 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 11.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.19× in 2019

Woodlands Assisted Living's TCR rose 5.1 from 6.4 in 2016 to 11.5 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 1.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Columbus, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.4 · 169% of ind

  • DART 7.6 DART
  • RANK #141/243
  • PHOTO Braemar Living at Me…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Braemar Living at Medford (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Woodlands Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Woodlands Assisted Living averages 6.4 TCR (169% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Woodlands Assisted Living TCR series: 2016=6.4 · 2017=6.4 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=11.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Woodlands Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #141 safest of 243 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Ohio.

Woodlands Assisted Living (69 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Woodlands Assisted Living
Woodlands Assisted Living (69 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Woodlands Assisted Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 11.5 7.6 6 0 0
2018 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2017 6.4 0.0 2 0 0
2016 6.4 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OH · Columbus

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,500 employers in Columbus, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Braemar Living at Medford 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CSL Midlothian 2017, LLC 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waltonwood Cary Parkway IL 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Windsor Manor Nevada 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Trillium Farms Main Office 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cambridge Ohio 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Canton South Svc Ctr 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Shelly Company - Northeast Division - HMA 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital 13,367 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital Main Campus 10,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Methodist Hospital 9,759 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH1 5,057 FTE
NAT-TCR FDD SOCAL North - Highland - DTI 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (RLOL-6408) 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ford Spraying, Inc. dba Ford Ranches 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Leisure Services 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Marble Division 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0000000700 Transit-Mass 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE C020 Easton 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE In-N-Out Lathrop Warehouse 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.