Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Woodridge

Monroe, NC · ~50 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Woodridge runs at 253% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Woodridge: 9.6 TCR = 253% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Woodridge safety composite

Woodridge scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2016→2024

Woodridge injury rate improved

Woodridge's TCR fell 2.1 from 2.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 36.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.1 · 2017=2.1 · 2018=6.3 · 2019=4.2 · 2020=36.8 · 2021=24.7 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=5.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Monroe, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.6 · 253% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #274/356
  • PHOTO 1855-AHSCM40
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1855-AHSCM40 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Woodridge in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Woodridge averages 9.6 TCR (253% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Woodridge TCR series: 2016=2.1 · 2017=2.1 · 2018=6.3 · 2019=4.2 · 2020=36.8 · 2021=24.7 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=5.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Woodridge falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #274 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Woodridge (50 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Woodridge
Woodridge (50 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Woodridge has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 5.1 2.5 2 0 0
2022 5.2 2.6 2 0 0
2021 24.7 2.8 1 8 0
2020 36.8 2.3 1 15 0
2019 4.2 4.2 2 0 0
2018 6.3 4.2 3 0 0
2017 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2016 2.1 2.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Monroe

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 163 employers in Monroe, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1855-AHSCM40 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Chandler Estate, Inc. 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Johnson City 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale North Richland Hills 9.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Terrell and Johnny Williams 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wadesboro Hatchery / Transp 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northern Region Office (Cary) 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE WEMC - Youngsville 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monroe Plant 1,584 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0060-CHS Union 1,214 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0060-Atrium Health Union 1,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1108-Atrium Health Union (1108) 1,041 FTE
NAT-TCR El Ahorro Supermarket #18, LLC 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Encompass Health Deaconess Rehabilitation Hospital 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Long Grove Rehabilitation & Health Care Center 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sheena Logistics LLC 9.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Grand Prairie, TX - 2100 Refuge Way 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jacksonville, FL - 4590 POW MIA Memorial Parkway 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yates Center Health & Rehab 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fenley - HS 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.