Gases, compressed and liquefied (except liquefied petroleum gas), merchant wholesalers · Ohio

Wooster Operations

Wooster, OH · ~33 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wooster Operations runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Gases, compressed and liquefied (except liquefied petroleum gas), merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade B.

Wooster Operations: 1.3 TCR = 60% of Gases, compressed and liquefied (except liquefied petroleum gas), merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wooster Operations safety composite

Wooster Operations scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Wooster Operations: 0.0 → 2.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 2.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.99× in 2024

Wooster Operations's TCR rose 2.6 from 0.0 in 2021 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424690 · Wooster, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.3 · 60% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #23/53
  • PHOTO Augusta Distribution
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Augusta Distribution (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Wooster Operations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wooster Operations averages 1.3 TCR (60% of the Gases, compressed and liquefied (except liquefied petroleum gas), merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wooster Operations TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 2.2

Where Wooster Operations falls in its industry

766 Gases, compressed and liquefie establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 53 Gases, compressed and liquefie employers in Ohio.

Wooster Operations (33 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Wooster Operations
Wooster Operations (33 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Wooster Operations has fewer employees than the Gases, compressed and liquefied (except median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2023 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424690 · OH · Wooster

766 Gases, compressed and liquefied (except liquefied petroleum gas), merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 133 employers in Wooster, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Augusta Distribution 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR La Porte Distribution 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hillyard Co. - New York 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hillyard Co. - Hutchinson 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Foertmeyer & Sons Greenhouse 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trillium Farms Croton Pullet 1 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Holmes-Wayne Electric Cooperative, Inc. 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Philadelphia Service Building 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Scaheffler Transmissions LLC 1,907 FTE
CITY-NEAR LuK USA LLC 1,814 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schaeffler Transmission LLC 1,662 FTE
CITY-NEAR College of Wooster 771 FTE
NAT-TCR Kratos Unmanned Aerial Systems CARO1 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR CMCO - Lexington Division - Columbus McKinnon 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Trenchtech Inc 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Kansas Electric, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Catalina Foothills 12745 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Merit Services 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Strongwell-Highlands Division 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Piggly Wiggly #28/Ace #15356 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.