Insurance carriers, health, direct · Michigan

Work from home

N/a, MI · ~1,208 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Work from home runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Insurance carriers, health, direct workplace, earning a grade A.

Work from home: 0.1 TCR = 16% of Insurance carriers, health, direct BLS 0.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Work from home safety composite

Work from home scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Work from home held a steady TCR band

Work from home's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 0.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 524114 · N/a, MI AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 16% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/12
  • PHOTO Point32Health Canton
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~1,208 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Point32Health Canton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Work from home in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Work from home averages 0.1 TCR (16% of the Insurance carriers, health, direct BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Work from home TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 0.5

Where Work from home falls in its industry

162 Insurance carriers, health, di establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 12 Insurance carriers, health, di employers in Michigan.

Work from home (1,208 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 360 employees and a TCR of 0.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Work from home
Work from home (1,208 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 360 employees and a TCR of 0.5

Work from home has more employees than the Insurance carriers, health, direct median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.4 0.3 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

524114 · MI · N/a

162 Insurance carriers, health, direct employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Point32Health Canton 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2573-MN101 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2573-MN910 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR BCBSNC Bldg 400 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2965-610 1,207 FTE
STATE-SIZE Williams International, LLC (HQ) 1,206 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pontiac Engineering 1,210 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henry Ford- Jackson Downtown Campus 1,201 FTE
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 144 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 187 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 232 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 338 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nelnet Diversified Solutions LLC 1,208 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indiana University Health North Hospital, Inc. 1,208 FTE
NAT-SIZE Neoma - Omaha Hub 1,208 FTE
NAT-SIZE 056789-San Francisco Ca P&Dc 1,208 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.