Sheet Metal Work Manufacturing · Georgia

World Wide Manufacturing

Dawsonville, GA · ~71 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

World Wide Manufacturing runs at 242% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sheet Metal Work Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

World Wide Manufacturing: 8.0 TCR = 242% of Sheet Metal Work Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

World Wide Manufacturing safety composite

World Wide Manufacturing scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2016→2024

World Wide Manufacturing injury rate improved

World Wide Manufacturing's TCR fell 4.8 from 8.0 in 2016 to 3.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 16.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.0 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=11.6 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=11.8 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=16.5 · 2023=10.0 · 2024=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Dawsonville, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.0 · 242% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #53/61
  • PHOTO Duro Dyne New York
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Duro Dyne New York (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

World Wide Manufacturing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows World Wide Manufacturing averages 8.0 TCR (242% of the Sheet Metal Work Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

World Wide Manufacturing TCR series: 2016=8 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=11.6 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=11.8 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=16.5 · 2023=10 · 2024=3.2 · BLS 3.3

Where World Wide Manufacturing falls in its industry

1,158 Sheet Metal Work Manufacturing establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #53 safest of 61 Sheet Metal Work Manufacturing employers in Georgia.

World Wide Manufacturing (71 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate World Wide Manufacturing
World Wide Manufacturing (71 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

World Wide Manufacturing has more employees than the Sheet Metal Work Manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.2 0.0 2 0 0
2023 10.0 5.0 5 1 0
2022 16.5 13.0 12 2 0
2021 3.2 1.6 1 1 0
2020 11.8 8.4 6 1 1
2019 4.5 3.0 3 0 0
2018 11.6 7.2 6 2 0
2017 3.1 3.1 2 0 0
2016 8.0 1.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · GA · Dawsonville

1,158 Sheet Metal Work Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 38 employers in Dawsonville, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Duro Dyne New York 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Berryville Sheetmetal and Fabrication 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR B&J, Inc 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Metal Company, Inc. 8.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cartersville Operating 10 and 41 Massell Drive Cartersville 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smith Douglas Support 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southeast Roofing Solutions 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tenant Mechanical Inc 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR GC01 Dawsonville, Gold Creek Processing, LLC. 363 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3874 360 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3874 336 FTE
CITY-NEAR 011-00670 285 FTE
NAT-TCR Chesapeake Spice Co NV 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Norfolk Coating Services, LLC 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Vista Ridge Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Menke Poured Walls 8.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Red Oak IA 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Walsh 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boucher Brothers Miami Beach, LLC 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tailor Welded Blanks Canton 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.