Surfacing, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway · Minnesota

Wright County- Highway Department

Buffalo, MN · ~56 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wright County- Highway Department runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Surfacing, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway workplace, earning a grade A.

Wright County- Highway Department: 0.9 TCR = 33% of Surfacing, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wright County- Highway Department safety composite

Wright County- Highway Department scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Wright County- Highway Department held a steady TCR band

Wright County- Highway Department's TCR held near 0.0 from 1.8 in 2019 to 1.9 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 2.02× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=1.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Buffalo, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 33% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #5/107
  • PHOTO Carter Construction,…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Carter Construction, LLC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Wright County- Highway Department in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wright County- Highway Department averages 0.9 TCR (33% of the Surfacing, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wright County- Highway Department TCR series: 2019=1.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Wright County- Highway Department falls in its industry

4,078 Surfacing, highway, road, stre establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 107 Surfacing, highway, road, stre employers in Minnesota.

Wright County- Highway Department (56 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Wright County- Highway Department
Wright County- Highway Department (56 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Wright County- Highway Department has fewer employees than the Surfacing, highway, road, street, bridge median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.9 1.9 0 1 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · MN · Buffalo

4,078 Surfacing, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 74 employers in Buffalo, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Carter Construction, LLC. 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stacy and Witbeck, Inc. - Ogden BRT 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shields Asphalt Paving 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1804 Bois D'Arc 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE LDC.FAR 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Public Utilities 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shakopee Public Utilities 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Mankato 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health One Buffalo (Buffalo Hospital) 532 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health One Buffalo 500 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1577 404 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1577 320 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Warren Wilson Coll-Dining Hall 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Auburn Univ. at Montgomery Fac 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Vanguard Group-Morgan 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at United Club Iah App Care 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Houston Tristar 3I 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Region 11 RBCO - WY-WST-CA 90-11-01-90 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rbco 10 Wa-Nw 90-10-01-90 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Titan Armored Inc. 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.