Wind Electric Power Generation · Michigan

WTB Tuscola Bay Wind Plant

Reese, MI · ~20 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

WTB Tuscola Bay Wind Plant runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Wind Electric Power Generation workplace, earning a grade C.

WTB Tuscola Bay Wind Plant: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Wind Electric Power Generation BLS 1.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

WTB Tuscola Bay Wind Plant safety composite

WTB Tuscola Bay Wind Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

WTB Tuscola Bay Wind Plant held a steady TCR band

WTB Tuscola Bay Wind Plant's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.0 TCR.

2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221115 · Reese, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P100
  • PHOTO Avangrid Renewables
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Avangrid Renewables (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

WTB Tuscola Bay Wind Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows WTB Tuscola Bay Wind Plant averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Wind Electric Power Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

WTB Tuscola Bay Wind Plant TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 1.2

Where WTB Tuscola Bay Wind Plant falls in its industry

64 Wind Electric Power Generation establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
WTB Tuscola Bay Wind Plant (20 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 1.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate WTB Tuscola Bay Wind Plant
WTB Tuscola Bay Wind Plant (20 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 1.4

WTB Tuscola Bay Wind Plant has fewer employees than the Wind Electric Power Generation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221115 · MI · Reese

64 Wind Electric Power Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 6 employers in Reese, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Avangrid Renewables 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Enel North America, Inc. 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR New York Headquarters 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR BHI Energy - Renewables 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tholrund Brothers 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Indeck Niles Energy Center 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michigan Solar Solutions West 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marshall SC 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR DHT 332 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2291_4079 320 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blumfield Piling Ground 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advanced Micronutrient Products 31 FTE
NAT-TCR Integration Appliance Inc. 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 128 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Airborn Inc. Addison 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Keller Warehouse 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lexington, Ky #00001 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Modesto, Ca #00016 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Riverside, Ca #00026 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Salt Lake City, Ut #00041 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.