Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Missouri

Wunderlich Fibre Box Company

St. Louis, MO · ~49 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wunderlich Fibre Box Company runs at 37% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade A.

Wunderlich Fibre Box Company: 1.2 TCR = 37% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wunderlich Fibre Box Company safety composite

Wunderlich Fibre Box Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2022→2024

Wunderlich Fibre Box Company injury rate improved

Wunderlich Fibre Box Company's TCR fell 0.4 from 2.0 in 2022 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · St. Louis, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 37% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #14/36
  • PHOTO Hood Container Wilmi…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hood Container Wilmington (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Wunderlich Fibre Box Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wunderlich Fibre Box Company averages 1.2 TCR (37% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wunderlich Fibre Box Company TCR series: 2022=2 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Wunderlich Fibre Box Company falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 36 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Missouri.

Wunderlich Fibre Box Company (49 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Wunderlich Fibre Box Company
Wunderlich Fibre Box Company (49 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Wunderlich Fibre Box Company has fewer employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · MO · St. Louis

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 686 employers in St. Louis, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hood Container Wilmington 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Paper Beltline 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aurora Container 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Paper Company 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Circle A Ranches 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE 031 - Meter Services - MO 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mount Vernon Headquarters 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bolivar Headquarters 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monsanto - St. Louis 6,028 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony's Medical Center 3,706 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABI Corporation 2,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Louis University Hospital 2,084 FTE
NAT-TCR Brownsville Texas 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Bucolo Cold Storage Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Swiss American CDMO 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Merit Steel Co 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Glassey SteelWorks, Inc. 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Front Range Wireless, Inc. 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alpha Iron, LLC 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE French Color & Fragrance Co., Inc 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.