Skilled nursing facilities · West Virginia

Wyoming Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Charleston, WV · ~75 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wyoming Nursing and Rehabilitation Center runs at 241% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Wyoming Nursing and Rehabilitation Center: 15.7 TCR = 241% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wyoming Nursing and Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Wyoming Nursing and Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
F 23.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Wyoming Nursing and Rehabilitation Center: 8.5 → 26.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 26.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.48× in 2022

Wyoming Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's TCR rose 18.3 from 8.5 in 2017 to 26.8 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Charleston, WV ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.7 · 241% of ind

  • DART 23.2 DART
  • RANK #125/171
  • PHOTO Maple Leaf Healthcar…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Maple Leaf Healthcare Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · West Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Wyoming Nursing and Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wyoming Nursing and Rehabilitation Center averages 15.7 TCR (241% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wyoming Nursing and Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2017=8.5 · 2018=11.8 · 2022=26.8 · BLS 6.5

Where Wyoming Nursing and Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to West Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #125 safest of 171 Skilled nursing facilities employers in West Virginia.

Wyoming Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (75 employees, TCR 15.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Wyoming Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Wyoming Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (75 employees, TCR 15.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Wyoming Nursing and Rehabilitation Center has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 26.8 23.2 4 11 0
2018 11.8 11.8 7 0 0
2017 8.5 8.5 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · WV · Charleston

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,269 rated employers in West Virginia with headcount on file · 158 employers in Charleston, WV · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Maple Leaf Healthcare Center 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Complete Care at Bey Lea 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Rome 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avon Convalescent Home, Inc. 15.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE AWP-Cowen 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Skana Aluminum West Virginia 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Technimark WV 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE The H.T. Hackney 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAMC Memorial Hospital 3,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAMC Memorial Division 3,374 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital 3,232 FTE
CITY-NEAR Charleston Area Medical Center General Division 1,990 FTE
NAT-TCR Scott Engineering, Inc. 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Life Care Center of Westminster 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 116 Elburn and Countryside Fire Protection Di 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Complete Care at Bey Lea 15.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mesa Vista Inn Health Center 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate Office 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Florida 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant 107 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.