Door opening and closing devices (except electrical), metal, manufacturing · North Carolina

Yale Security Inc. - Norton Door

Monroe, NC · ~197 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Yale Security Inc. - Norton Door runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Door opening and closing devices (except electrical), metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Yale Security Inc. - Norton Door: 0.7 TCR = 20% of Door opening and closing devices (except electrical), metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Yale Security Inc. - Norton Door safety composite

Yale Security Inc. - Norton Door scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Yale Security Inc. - Norton Door: 0.0 → 0.8 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 1.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.18× in 2020

Yale Security Inc. - Norton Door's TCR rose 0.8 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.8 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 1.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332510 · Monroe, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 20% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #1/11
  • PHOTO EMKA, Inc.
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~197 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EMKA, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Yale Security Inc. - Norton Door in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Yale Security Inc. - Norton Door averages 0.7 TCR (20% of the Door opening and closing devices (except electrical), metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Yale Security Inc. - Norton Door TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=0.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Yale Security Inc. - Norton Door falls in its industry

189 Door opening and closing devic establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 11 Door opening and closing devic employers in North Carolina.

Yale Security Inc. - Norton Door (197 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Yale Security Inc. - Norton Door
Yale Security Inc. - Norton Door (197 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Yale Security Inc. - Norton Door has more employees than the Door opening and closing devices (except median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.8 0.8 2 0 0
2019 0.7 0.4 2 0 0
2018 1.1 0.4 2 1 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332510 · NC · Monroe

189 Door opening and closing devices (except electrical), metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 163 employers in Monroe, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EMKA, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Federal Cartridge Company 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Teledyne Marine Systems 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wyman Gordon-Dillon 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sealing Agents 197 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant 36-37 197 FTE
STATE-SIZE Burt's Bees 197 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hunter Douglas Window Designs - NC 197 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monroe Plant 1,584 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0060-CHS Union 1,214 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0060-Atrium Health Union 1,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1108-Atrium Health Union (1108) 1,041 FTE
NAT-TCR TechServ Consulting & Training, LTD 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Crescent Park Corporation - C8 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Utility Trailer MFG. CO. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR HollyFrontier El Dorado Refining LLC 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pesado Construction Company 197 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc - Kenosha Facility 197 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maitland, FL Regional Office - pms96100 197 FTE
NAT-SIZE Transportation Operations 197 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.