Assembly line rebuilding of automotive and truck gasoline engines · Ohio

Yamada North America, Inc.

South Charleston, OH · ~509 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Yamada North America, Inc. runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assembly line rebuilding of automotive and truck gasoline engines workplace, earning a grade B.

Yamada North America, Inc.: 2.9 TCR = 53% of Assembly line rebuilding of automotive and truck gasoline engines BLS 5.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Yamada North America, Inc. safety composite

Yamada North America, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2016→2024

Yamada North America, Inc. injury rate improved

Yamada North America, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.1 from 4.5 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.5 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=1.4 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336310 · South Charleston, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.9 · 53% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #11/19
  • PHOTO Cal Grinding, Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 106 inj
  • SIZE ~509 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cal Grinding, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Yamada North America, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Yamada North America, Inc. averages 2.9 TCR (53% of the Assembly line rebuilding of automotive and truck gasoline engines BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Yamada North America, Inc. TCR series: 2016=4.5 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=1.4 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 5.4

Where Yamada North America, Inc. falls in its industry

221 Assembly line rebuilding of au establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 19 Assembly line rebuilding of au employers in Ohio.

Yamada North America, Inc. (509 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 165 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Yamada North America, Inc.
Yamada North America, Inc. (509 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 165 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Yamada North America, Inc. has more employees than the Assembly line rebuilding of automotive a median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 0.9 8 0 0
2023 1.7 1.7 6 0 0
2022 1.2 1.2 4 0 0
2020 1.4 1.4 5 0 0
2019 2.7 2.7 13 0 0
2018 4.5 4.5 20 0 0
2017 4.5 4.5 25 0 0
2016 4.5 4.5 25 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336310 · OH · South Charleston

221 Assembly line rebuilding of automotive and truck gasoline engines employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 6 employers in South Charleston, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cal Grinding, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Flint Engine Operations 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Burgess Norton Mfg. Co., Inc. (Plant 1) 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edelbrock Group 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE VelocityVelocity, A Managed Services Company, Inc. 509 FTE
STATE-SIZE JANCOA Janitorial Services, Inc. 509 FTE
STATE-SIZE GE Current NELA 508 FTE
STATE-SIZE 88403 508 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buckeye Diamond Logistics 181 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kamps Pallets South Charleston 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR STgenetics-Ohio Heifer Center 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sunrise Cooperative - South Charleston Agronomy 45 FTE
NAT-TCR Patriot Energy Solutions Corp 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 300000170857337 - GA-Atlanta-Operating Center 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR VBZ 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR USA College Park 4340 Global Gtwy Connector 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE CA-General Office #5 - SCE 10 509 FTE
NAT-SIZE Accredo Packaging Inc. 509 FTE
NAT-SIZE Interstate Building Maintenance Corporation 509 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baker Hughes Pump Plant 509 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.