Remediation and clean up of contaminated buildings, mine sites, soil, or ground water · Arizona

Yellow Jacket Drilling

Phoenix, AZ · ~140 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Yellow Jacket Drilling runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Remediation and clean up of contaminated buildings, mine sites, soil, or ground water workplace, earning a grade A.

Yellow Jacket Drilling: 0.9 TCR = 34% of Remediation and clean up of contaminated buildings, mine sites, soil, or ground water BLS 2.6 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Yellow Jacket Drilling safety composite

Yellow Jacket Drilling scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Yellow Jacket Drilling held a steady TCR band

Yellow Jacket Drilling's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.8 in 2016 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.8 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.5 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562910 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 34% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #2/9
  • PHOTO Silver Mountain Cons…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~140 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Silver Mountain Construction (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Yellow Jacket Drilling in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Yellow Jacket Drilling averages 0.9 TCR (34% of the Remediation and clean up of contaminated buildings, mine sites, soil, or ground water BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Yellow Jacket Drilling TCR series: 2016=0.8 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.5 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 2.6

Where Yellow Jacket Drilling falls in its industry

672 Remediation and clean up of co establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 9 Remediation and clean up of co employers in Arizona.

Yellow Jacket Drilling (140 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 1.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Yellow Jacket Drilling
Yellow Jacket Drilling (140 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 1.8

Yellow Jacket Drilling has more employees than the Remediation and clean up of contaminated median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.5 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.9 1.9 2 1 0
2019 2.5 2.5 4 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2016 0.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562910 · AZ · Phoenix

672 Remediation and clean up of contaminated buildings, mine sites, soil, or ground water employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Silver Mountain Construction 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prism Response, LLC 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lewis Environmental, LLC- Lakeland 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR BEI - FL 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE FOUR SEASONS PRODUCE PACKING COMPANY, INC. - AZ 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE K. Hovnanian Phoenix Division, Inc Group Office / Phoenix Division 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE Younger Brothers Builder LLC 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oldcastle Building Envelope 140 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Baylor Research Institute 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 037 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Headquarters 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR HL Lawson & Son Inc 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 14 Londonderry 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1107 - NSM Mountain Park 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE JDM Materials Company 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cinfab 140 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.