Measuring instruments, industrial process control-type, manufacturing · Texas

Yokogawa Corporation of America (Sugar Land)

Sugar Land, TX · ~213 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Yokogawa Corporation of America (Sugar Land) runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Measuring instruments, industrial process control-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Yokogawa Corporation of America (Sugar Land): 0.0 TCR = 0% of Measuring instruments, industrial process control-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Yokogawa Corporation of America (Sugar Land) safety composite

Yokogawa Corporation of America (Sugar Land) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Yokogawa Corporation of America (Sugar Land) held a steady TCR band

Yokogawa Corporation of America (Sugar Land)'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.0 TCR.

2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334513 · Sugar Land, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/32
  • PHOTO MYRON L COMPANY
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~213 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MYRON L COMPANY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Yokogawa Corporation of America (Sugar Land) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Yokogawa Corporation of America (Sugar Land) averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Measuring instruments, industrial process control-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Yokogawa Corporation of America (Sugar Land) TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Yokogawa Corporation of America (Sugar Land) falls in its industry

322 Measuring instruments, industr establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 32 Measuring instruments, industr employers in Texas.

Yokogawa Corporation of America (Sugar Land) (213 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Yokogawa Corporation of America (Sugar Land)
Yokogawa Corporation of America (Sugar Land) (213 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Yokogawa Corporation of America (Sugar Land) has more employees than the Measuring instruments, industrial proces median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334513 · TX · Sugar Land

322 Measuring instruments, industrial process control-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 147 employers in Sugar Land, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MYRON L COMPANY 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ARKU, Inc. 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR VEGA AMERICAS INC. 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2967-PA28 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Greenspoint Service Center CP22 213 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fiber Glass Systems 213 FTE
STATE-SIZE GTI 213 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAPCO Precast LLC 213 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED 77,810 FTE
CITY-NEAR TEAM Industrial Services, Inc 5,005 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schlumberger Sugar Land South 1,934 FTE
CITY-NEAR IES Residential, Inc. 1,931 FTE
NAT-TCR Westell Inc Aurora 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pitman Glass Company 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR EPIC Tampa 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Monster Energy Company 2535 Anselmo Dr 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE PaperWorks Wabash Mill 213 FTE
NAT-SIZE Environmental Service Department 213 FTE
NAT-SIZE Imagine 213 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fire Department 213 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.