Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Michigan

Yorkshire & Stonebridge Manor

Walker, MI · ~73 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Yorkshire & Stonebridge Manor runs at 313% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Yorkshire & Stonebridge Manor: 11.9 TCR = 313% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Yorkshire & Stonebridge Manor safety composite

Yorkshire & Stonebridge Manor scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.0

2016→2021

Yorkshire & Stonebridge Manor injury rate improved

Yorkshire & Stonebridge Manor's TCR fell 5.0 from 14.0 in 2016 to 9.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 15.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.0 · 2017=11.3 · 2018=8.0 · 2019=14.0 · 2020=15.1 · 2021=9.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Walker, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.9 · 313% of ind

  • DART 9.0 DART
  • RANK #167/201
  • PHOTO Heritage assisted li…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Heritage assisted living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Yorkshire & Stonebridge Manor in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Yorkshire & Stonebridge Manor averages 11.9 TCR (313% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Yorkshire & Stonebridge Manor TCR series: 2016=14 · 2017=11.3 · 2018=8 · 2019=14 · 2020=15.1 · 2021=9 · BLS 3.8

Where Yorkshire & Stonebridge Manor falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #167 safest of 201 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Michigan.

Yorkshire & Stonebridge Manor (73 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Yorkshire & Stonebridge Manor
Yorkshire & Stonebridge Manor (73 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Yorkshire & Stonebridge Manor has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 9.0 9.0 4 0 0
2020 15.1 10.1 9 0 0
2019 14.0 6.0 7 0 0
2018 8.0 4.0 4 0 0
2017 11.3 11.3 6 0 0
2016 14.0 10.5 6 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MI · Walker

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 67 employers in Walker, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Heritage assisted living 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Janmaur II LLC dba Mckillop Residence 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR RidgeView Assisted Living Burlington 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CHAPEL HILL AL 11.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Field Work 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michiana SC 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-County Electric- Portland 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midwest Powerline, LLC 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DGR1 793 FTE
CITY-NEAR BHI Bissell Homecare Inc. 705 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walker Stamping & Assembly (Challenge Manufacturing-Plant 1) 469 FTE
CITY-NEAR West Contract Manufacturing Grand Rapids 465 FTE
NAT-TCR construction 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Qrc, Inc. 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Wilson Trailer Comapany Plant 7 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR American Vision Windows 11.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Knoxville/Lenoir City Terminal - NON DOT 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rayville Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Nogales Usd #1 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Town of Bargersville 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.