Backfilling, construction · North Carolina

Young and McQueen Grading Company Inc

Burnsville, NC · ~88 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Young and McQueen Grading Company Inc runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Backfilling, construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Young and McQueen Grading Company Inc: 1.2 TCR = 44% of Backfilling, construction BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Young and McQueen Grading Company Inc safety composite

Young and McQueen Grading Company Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Young and McQueen Grading Company Inc: 1.7 → 2.0 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 2.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

Young and McQueen Grading Company Inc's TCR rose 0.4 from 1.7 in 2016 to 2.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238910 · Burnsville, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 44% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #26/76
  • PHOTO Renascent Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~88 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Renascent Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Young and McQueen Grading Company Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Young and McQueen Grading Company Inc averages 1.2 TCR (44% of the Backfilling, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Young and McQueen Grading Company Inc TCR series: 2016=1.7 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=2 · BLS 2.8

Where Young and McQueen Grading Company Inc falls in its industry

1,750 Backfilling, construction establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 76 Backfilling, construction employers in North Carolina.

Young and McQueen Grading Company Inc (88 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Young and McQueen Grading Company Inc
Young and McQueen Grading Company Inc (88 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Young and McQueen Grading Company Inc has more employees than the Backfilling, construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.0 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2019 1.6 0.0 2 0 0
2018 2.1 0.0 2 0 0
2017 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2016 1.7 0.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238910 · NC · Burnsville

1,750 Backfilling, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 15 employers in Burnsville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Renascent Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Burford Construction South Carolina Statewide Operations 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 431 Payran St 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlantic Coast Dismantling-Environmental and Infrastructure Group Joint Venture 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Public Utilities 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bayliss Boatworks Inc. 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE BU 3434 - I-40_I-77 Statesville, NC 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gastonia Plant 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR Burnsville 789 FTE
CITY-NEAR Glen Raven Custom Fabrics - Burnsville Plant 269 FTE
CITY-NEAR Glen Raven Custom Fabrics, Burnsville, NC 202 FTE
CITY-NEAR Burnsville Plant 184 FTE
NAT-TCR Abbe Lumber Corporation 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Gemini Framing Inc 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Pratt (Corrugated Logistics), LLC 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR JM Eagle Co. 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Goodwill Industries of Central East Texas, Inc. 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Andrade, Inc dba Everett's Auto Parts 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE DZ Grinders, LLC 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE D & M Contracting Inc 88 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.