General Warehousing and Storage · Ohio

Youngstown Warehouse - 02

Youngstown, OH · ~64 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Youngstown Warehouse - 02 runs at 50% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade B.

Youngstown Warehouse - 02: 2.9 TCR = 50% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Youngstown Warehouse - 02 safety composite

Youngstown Warehouse - 02 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.8

2016→2024

Youngstown Warehouse - 02 injury rate improved

Youngstown Warehouse - 02's TCR fell 7.8 from 7.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.8 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=1.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Youngstown, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.9 · 50% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #277/556
  • PHOTO San Antonio, DC
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: San Antonio, DC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Youngstown Warehouse - 02 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Youngstown Warehouse - 02 averages 2.9 TCR (50% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Youngstown Warehouse - 02 TCR series: 2016=7.8 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=1.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Youngstown Warehouse - 02 falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #277 safest of 556 General Warehousing and Storag employers in Ohio.

Youngstown Warehouse - 02 (64 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Youngstown Warehouse - 02
Youngstown Warehouse - 02 (64 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Youngstown Warehouse - 02 has fewer employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2021 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2020 2.9 2.9 2 0 0
2019 3.9 3.9 3 0 0
2018 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2017 3.8 3.8 3 0 0
2016 7.8 7.8 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · OH · Youngstown

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 276 employers in Youngstown, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR San Antonio, DC 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eldridge IA 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 19200 Treat Road Walton Hills OH 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - SWI1 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wm. A. Natorp Company 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE TIMBUK FARMS INC 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE GreenTop Acres, LLC 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chillicothe Service Center 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Elizabeth Health Center 2,702 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health St Elizabeth Health Hospital 2,679 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ohio Edison Company 832 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vallourec Star, LP 681 FTE
NAT-TCR Crown Lift Trucks Charlotte 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Membrane Process & Controls, Inc 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunright America 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Universal Forest Products 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bettis Contractors, Inc. 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE William F. Lynch Co., Inc. 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southwest Concrete Paving Co. 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alltite LLC 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.