Youth centers (except recreational only) · California

Youth Work Services-Central

Los Angeles, CA · ~28 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Youth Work Services-Central runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Youth centers (except recreational only) workplace, earning a grade A.

Youth Work Services-Central: 1.2 TCR = 32% of Youth centers (except recreational only) BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Youth Work Services-Central safety composite

Youth Work Services-Central scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Youth Work Services-Central held a steady TCR band

Youth Work Services-Central's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=6.1 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624110 · Los Angeles, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/53
  • PHOTO Community Supports O…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Community Supports Office (West Main Rsvl) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Youth Work Services-Central in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Youth Work Services-Central averages 1.2 TCR (32% of the Youth centers (except recreational only) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Youth Work Services-Central TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=6.1 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Youth Work Services-Central falls in its industry

328 Youth centers (except recreati establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 53 Youth centers (except recreati employers in California.

Youth Work Services-Central (28 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Youth Work Services-Central
Youth Work Services-Central (28 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Youth Work Services-Central has fewer employees than the Youth centers (except recreational only) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 6.1 0.0 0 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624110 · CA · Los Angeles

328 Youth centers (except recreational only) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Community Supports Office (West Main Rsvl) 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Children's Services and Immigration Office 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Casey Family Programs - San Diego 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Catholic Community Services 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Davis Ranch L.L.C. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steinbeck Country Produce 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harlan Family Ranch 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE KKG Equipment Company, LLC32 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. 50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Los Angeles 40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR LADWP 11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR Great Lakes Fort Wayne 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Florida Food Products, LLC 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Veritiv Operating Company - SC008 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR RS Electric Corp 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fairbanks Materials Inc. 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Logis, Inc. 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE South Shore Medical Center 5 Tarklin 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE TX - Coors (6657) 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.