General services departments, government · California

Yuba County Courthouse

Marysville, CA · ~427 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.3
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Yuba County Courthouse runs at 417% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical General services departments, government workplace, earning a grade F.

Yuba County Courthouse: 13.3 TCR = 417% of General services departments, government BLS 3.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Yuba County Courthouse safety composite

Yuba County Courthouse scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Yuba County Courthouse: 6.9 → 11.7 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 74.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.83× in 2024

Yuba County Courthouse's TCR rose 4.8 from 6.9 in 2017 to 11.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 74.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.83× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · Marysville, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 13.3 · 417% of ind

  • DART 11.1 DART
  • RANK #225/256
  • PHOTO City of Ottumwa, Iowa
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 89 inj
  • SIZE ~427 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City of Ottumwa, Iowa (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Yuba County Courthouse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Yuba County Courthouse averages 13.3 TCR (417% of the General services departments, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Yuba County Courthouse TCR series: 2017=6.9 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=13.2 · 2021=24.7 · 2022=74.5 · 2023=26.6 · 2024=11.7 · BLS 3.2

Where Yuba County Courthouse falls in its industry

1,496 General services departments, establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #225 safest of 256 General services departments, employers in California.

Yuba County Courthouse (427 employees, TCR 13.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Yuba County Courthouse
Yuba County Courthouse (427 employees, TCR 13.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Yuba County Courthouse has more employees than the General services departments, government median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.7 11.1 7 10 0
2023 26.6 24.8 11 32 0
2022 74.5 66.9 14 104 0
2021 24.7 14.4 22 19 0
2020 13.2 9.4 11 10 0
2019 4.8 0.6 6 2 0
2018 5.5 2.1 8 0 0
2017 6.9 3.5 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · CA · Marysville

1,496 General services departments, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 39 employers in Marysville, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City of Ottumwa, Iowa 13.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Lake Crystal 13.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Chicago Dept of Assets, Information and Services - 4233 W. Ferdinand St. 13.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Summit Township 13.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Vacco INdustries 427 FTE
STATE-SIZE FRESNO CA 427 FTE
STATE-SIZE Roseville Galleria 408 427 FTE
STATE-SIZE 290 Oceanside Ca 427 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 64 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 583 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 619 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 57 2,054 FTE
NAT-TCR Pennsylvania Coach - Elizabeth 13.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Premier Healthcare of New Harmony 13.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Minnesota Specialty Health System - Brainerd 13.3 TCR
NAT-TCR City of New Brighton Public Safety 13.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Newberry County Memorial Hospital 427 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kennedy 427 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rogers 427 FTE
NAT-SIZE Keeco, LLC-Martinsville 427 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.