General services departments, government · California

Yuba County Packard Building

Marysville, CA · ~303 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.5
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Yuba County Packard Building runs at 296% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical General services departments, government workplace, earning a grade F.

Yuba County Packard Building: 9.5 TCR = 296% of General services departments, government BLS 3.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Yuba County Packard Building safety composite

Yuba County Packard Building scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 18.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Yuba County Packard Building: 3.0 → 18.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 64.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.98× in 2024

Yuba County Packard Building's TCR rose 15.8 from 3.0 in 2017 to 18.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 64.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.98× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · Marysville, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.5 · 296% of ind

  • DART 18.8 DART
  • RANK #183/256
  • PHOTO Public Works Water T…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 56 inj
  • SIZE ~303 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Public Works Water Treatment and Distribution (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Yuba County Packard Building in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Yuba County Packard Building averages 9.5 TCR (296% of the General services departments, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Yuba County Packard Building TCR series: 2017=3 · 2018=4 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=64.9 · 2023=32.6 · 2024=18.8 · BLS 3.2

Where Yuba County Packard Building falls in its industry

1,496 General services departments, establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #183 safest of 256 General services departments, employers in California.

Yuba County Packard Building (303 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Yuba County Packard Building
Yuba County Packard Building (303 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Yuba County Packard Building has more employees than the General services departments, government median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 18.8 18.8 3 53 0
2023 32.6 32.2 8 89 0
2022 64.9 64.6 3 184 0
2021 2.1 1.1 4 2 0
2020 2.7 1.3 8 0 0
2019 3.2 1.9 10 0 0
2018 4.0 2.1 12 1 0
2017 3.0 1.6 8 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · CA · Marysville

1,496 General services departments, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 39 employers in Marysville, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Public Works Water Treatment and Distribution 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Redding Public Works 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR San Joaquin Correctional Health Services 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Fullerton 9.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE River Ranch 303 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3118_6025 303 FTE
STATE-SIZE Teva Pharmaceuticals 303 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bell Brothers Heating and Air, Inc 303 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 64 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 583 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 619 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 57 2,054 FTE
NAT-TCR C033 Zanesville 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Main 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Breakthru Beverage South Carolina - Hilton Head 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR TXD030 9.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Shop Rite of Stroudsburg 303 FTE
NAT-SIZE Don CeSar Resort and Beach House Suites 303 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mountain City 303 FTE
NAT-SIZE Masterpiece Flower Company LLC 303 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.