General warehousing and storage · South Carolina

Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Charleston

North Charleston, SC · ~100 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Charleston runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Charleston: 1.8 TCR = 32% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Charleston safety composite

Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Charleston scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Charleston held a steady TCR band

Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Charleston's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 5.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.0 · 2023=5.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · North Charleston, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.8 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #45/160
  • PHOTO DC1 & DC2
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DC1 & DC2 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Charleston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Charleston averages 1.8 TCR (32% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Charleston TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=5.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Charleston falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #45 safest of 160 General warehousing and storag employers in South Carolina.

Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Charleston (100 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Charleston
Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Charleston (100 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Charleston has more employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 5.5 5.5 6 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · SC · North Charleston

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 256 employers in North Charleston, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DC1 & DC2 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stanley Black & Decker Columbus DC 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ryder Milton 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Expeditors - SAV 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corley 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE SC Pet Food Solutions 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4043 Spartanburg Sheet Plant 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbia (State Printing) 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Charleston County 2,601 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palmetto Goodwill Services 1,105 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trident Medical Center 1,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR SRC Charleston ISS Division 815 FTE
NAT-TCR Edwards Lifesciences LLC 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ridgeline Pipe Manufacturing 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Belmont Instrument headquarters 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Learjet Inc. - Dallas Service Center 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Geiger Excavating Inc. 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pioneer Logistics LLC 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wingren Landscape Inc 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE SMP Health - St. Andrew's 100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.