General warehousing and storage · Texas

Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Laredo

Laredo, TX · ~50 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Laredo runs at 5% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Laredo: 0.3 TCR = 5% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Laredo safety composite

Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Laredo scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Laredo: 0.0 → 1.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.5 TCR · DART/TCR 5× in 2024

Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Laredo's TCR rose 1.5 from 0.0 in 2020 to 1.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Laredo, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 5% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #7/846
  • PHOTO Alfa Laval Inc. AMDC…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Alfa Laval Inc. AMDC Indy (loc code: INAMDC) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Laredo in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Laredo averages 0.3 TCR (5% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Laredo TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 5.8

Where Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Laredo falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 846 General warehousing and storag employers in Texas.

Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Laredo (50 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Laredo
Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Laredo (50 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Laredo has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · TX · Laredo

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 245 employers in Laredo, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Alfa Laval Inc. AMDC Indy (loc code: INAMDC) 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schenker, Inc (Pandora - Columbus) 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hollingsworth Dequindre 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR P&G Distributing LLC - SEFC 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE 1836 Farms LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schwertner Farms, Inc. 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Floydada Coop Gin #1 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gulf Coast Area Office 6400 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office of Field Operations - Laredo 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Laredo 1,775 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-21080000-21080 748 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-62 672 FTE
NAT-TCR Princeton 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 061-ELG 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Commonwealth Plumbing Corp. 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 407 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE USA Chehalis WA 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nta Frcsw Naval Base 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE T.W. Clark Construction 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Canal Dover Furniture 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.