Building framing (except structural steel) · New York

Zapata Construction New York

Pelham, NY · ~47 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Zapata Construction New York runs at 116% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Building framing (except structural steel) workplace, earning a grade C.

Zapata Construction New York: 3.3 TCR = 116% of Building framing (except structural steel) BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Zapata Construction New York safety composite

Zapata Construction New York scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2018→2023

Zapata Construction New York injury rate improved

Zapata Construction New York's TCR fell 0.4 from 3.2 in 2018 to 2.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 7.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.2 · 2019=7.3 · 2020=4.2 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238130 · Pelham, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 116% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #7/13
  • PHOTO Vance Brothers Const…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Vance Brothers Construction, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Zapata Construction New York in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Zapata Construction New York averages 3.3 TCR (116% of the Building framing (except structural steel) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Zapata Construction New York TCR series: 2018=3.2 · 2019=7.3 · 2020=4.2 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Zapata Construction New York falls in its industry

387 Building framing (except struc establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 13 Building framing (except struc employers in New York.

Zapata Construction New York (47 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Zapata Construction New York
Zapata Construction New York (47 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Zapata Construction New York has fewer employees than the Building framing (except structural stee median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2020 4.2 4.2 2 0 0
2019 7.3 7.3 5 0 0
2018 3.2 1.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238130 · NY · Pelham

387 Building framing (except structural steel) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 10 employers in Pelham, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Vance Brothers Construction, Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sombrero Construction 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Michael J. Wright Construction Co., Inc. at Eglin AFB 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Panelized Structures, Inc. 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE CSS Farms, LLC Bliss, NY 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brightly Farms, LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Red Jacket Orchards 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barbland Dairy LLC 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lippolis Electric, Inc. 416 FTE
CITY-NEAR Component Assembly Systems 263 FTE
CITY-NEAR 25320201 PELHAM MANOR, NY 259 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2532-25320201 258 FTE
NAT-TCR Day Mechanical Systems, Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Shady Grove Family YMCA 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Regan Elementary School 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Marglen Industries 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE North America : Wedowee 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Village of Willowbrook 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Newark Natural Foods 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gear Co. of America, Inc. 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.