Bars, concrete reinforcing (rebar), made from purchased steel in steel rolling mills · Massachusetts

Zapp Precision Strip, Inc

Dartmouth, MA · ~50 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Zapp Precision Strip, Inc runs at 238% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Bars, concrete reinforcing (rebar), made from purchased steel in steel rolling mills workplace, earning a grade F.

Zapp Precision Strip, Inc: 7.8 TCR = 238% of Bars, concrete reinforcing (rebar), made from purchased steel in steel rolling mills BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Zapp Precision Strip, Inc safety composite

Zapp Precision Strip, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Zapp Precision Strip, Inc: 2.1 → 5.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 15.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.49× in 2022

Zapp Precision Strip, Inc's TCR rose 3.6 from 2.1 in 2017 to 5.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 15.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331221 · Dartmouth, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.8 · 238% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO Erect A Line Inc
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Erect A Line Inc (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Zapp Precision Strip, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Zapp Precision Strip, Inc averages 7.8 TCR (238% of the Bars, concrete reinforcing (rebar), made from purchased steel in steel rolling mills BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Zapp Precision Strip, Inc TCR series: 2017=2.1 · 2019=13.6 · 2020=15.8 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=5.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Zapp Precision Strip, Inc falls in its industry

206 Bars, concrete reinforcing (re establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Bars, concrete reinforcing (re employers in Massachusetts.

Zapp Precision Strip, Inc (50 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Zapp Precision Strip, Inc
Zapp Precision Strip, Inc (50 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Zapp Precision Strip, Inc has fewer employees than the Bars, concrete reinforcing (rebar), made median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 5.8 3.9 2 1 0
2021 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2020 15.8 7.9 6 2 0
2019 13.6 9.7 6 1 0
2017 2.1 2.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331221 · MA · Dartmouth

206 Bars, concrete reinforcing (rebar), made from purchased steel in steel rolling mills employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 25 employers in Dartmouth, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Erect A Line Inc 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Charter Wire LLC 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nimthor Delta 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cardinal Manufacturing 7.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bountiful Farms Cultivation 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE C3 Industries, Inc - Franklin 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allegrone Construction Co., Inc. 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Acella 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southcoast Behavioral Hospital 335 FTE
CITY-NEAR MADAR - DARTMOUTH 216 FTE
CITY-NEAR NAI-0033-0033-00619 FAC-00619-NORTH DARTMOUTH-MA 203 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5472-000000619 199 FTE
NAT-TCR 4054-ABS-0030-0030-00180 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Blount Memorial Hospital 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 332349-Edi-Nixon Sta 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR J.D. Williamson Construction Company, Inc. 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE HG743 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spider Wall Systems, Inc. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE PSSI - 0123 JBS USA - Omaha 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE PSSI - 0515 Tyson Enid - Raleigh Rd. 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.