Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing · Ohio

Zehrco Giancola Composites Inc - Z2

Ashtabula, OH · ~134 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Zehrco Giancola Composites Inc - Z2 runs at 158% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Zehrco Giancola Composites Inc - Z2: 5.2 TCR = 158% of Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Zehrco Giancola Composites Inc - Z2 safety composite

Zehrco Giancola Composites Inc - Z2 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Zehrco Giancola Composites Inc - Z2: 2.9 → 7.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 7.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.16× in 2024

Zehrco Giancola Composites Inc - Z2's TCR rose 4.7 from 2.9 in 2022 to 7.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Ashtabula, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 158% of ind

  • DART 6.0 DART
  • RANK #204/270
  • PHOTO Pella Corporation Ma…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~134 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pella Corporation Macomb Operations (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Zehrco Giancola Composites Inc - Z2 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Zehrco Giancola Composites Inc - Z2 averages 5.2 TCR (158% of the Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Zehrco Giancola Composites Inc - Z2 TCR series: 2022=2.9 · 2024=7.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Zehrco Giancola Composites Inc - Z2 falls in its industry

2,838 Awnings, rigid plastics or fib establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #204 safest of 270 Awnings, rigid plastics or fib employers in Ohio.

Zehrco Giancola Composites Inc - Z2 (134 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Zehrco Giancola Composites Inc - Z2
Zehrco Giancola Composites Inc - Z2 (134 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Zehrco Giancola Composites Inc - Z2 has more employees than the Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.5 6.0 5 0 0
2022 2.9 2.3 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · OH · Ashtabula

2,838 Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 85 employers in Ashtabula, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pella Corporation Macomb Operations 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Intertech Plastics, LLC 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sterilite Corporation LHC 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Midland - New Berlin 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE RRSC Home Office 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vm Systems Inc 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Perfection Group, Inc., Cincinnati 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE PCI Columbus Interior (582) 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ashtabula County Medical Center 976 FTE
CITY-NEAR Molded Fiber Glass Composite Systems Company 456 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2359 390 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2359 388 FTE
NAT-TCR Schwartz Manufacturing Company 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR York 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Washington United Terminals INC 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Rehabilitation Hospital of Phenix City, L.L.C. 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gestamp Alabama LLC - Lapeer 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coca Cola Puerto Rico Bottler Aguadilla 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beadles and Balfour LLC Subsidiary of Canfor 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northshore Exteriors WA 134 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.