Automobile dealers, new only or new and used · Illinois

Zeigler Nissan Orland Park

Orland Park, IL · ~166 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Zeigler Nissan Orland Park runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Automobile dealers, new only or new and used workplace, earning a grade C.

Zeigler Nissan Orland Park: 2.9 TCR = 84% of Automobile dealers, new only or new and used BLS 3.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Zeigler Nissan Orland Park safety composite

Zeigler Nissan Orland Park scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.6

2016→2024

Zeigler Nissan Orland Park injury rate improved

Zeigler Nissan Orland Park's TCR fell 6.6 from 9.5 in 2016 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.5 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 441110 · Orland Park, IL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 84% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #46/125
  • PHOTO A2D2 LLC MTN View Ni…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~166 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: A2D2 LLC MTN View Nissan of Dalton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Zeigler Nissan Orland Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Zeigler Nissan Orland Park averages 2.9 TCR (84% of the Automobile dealers, new only or new and used BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Zeigler Nissan Orland Park TCR series: 2016=9.5 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 3.4

Where Zeigler Nissan Orland Park falls in its industry

2,847 Automobile dealers, new only o establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 125 Automobile dealers, new only o employers in Illinois.

Zeigler Nissan Orland Park (166 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Zeigler Nissan Orland Park
Zeigler Nissan Orland Park (166 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Zeigler Nissan Orland Park has more employees than the Automobile dealers, new only or new and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 1.8 5 0 0
2023 1.2 0.0 2 0 0
2022 2.3 1.1 4 0 0
2021 1.2 1.2 2 0 0
2020 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2019 1.3 0.6 2 0 0
2018 3.8 3.8 5 0 0
2016 9.5 5.9 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

441110 · IL · Orland Park

2,847 Automobile dealers, new only or new and used employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 86 employers in Orland Park, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR A2D2 LLC MTN View Nissan of Dalton 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nissan Motor Corporation in Guam 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Zeigler Holland Kia 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cortese Chrysler Jeep Dodge inc 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE GRP Mechanical Company Inc 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE LFI HQ 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE Teasdale Latin Foods 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE Operations - Washington, IL 166 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1550 VILLAGE OF ORLAND PARK 778 FTE
CITY-NEAR Village of Orland Park 519 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0647 - ORLAND PARK IL WHSE 319 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carson Pirie Scott Orland Park 302 FTE
NAT-TCR Cub Foods Chaska - 5613 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Daisy Brand Garland 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Cabinet Max Corporation 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Ncgol - Goldsboro Center 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Maintainer Corporation of Iowa 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE G&H Orthodontics 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE Highland Homes Houston, LLC. 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bagby & Russell Electric Company 166 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.