Frozen fruit and vegetable processing · Pennsylvania

Zentis NA - Philadelphia

Philadelphia, PA · ~131 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Zentis NA - Philadelphia runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Frozen fruit and vegetable processing workplace, earning a grade C.

Zentis NA - Philadelphia: 3.0 TCR = 91% of Frozen fruit and vegetable processing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Zentis NA - Philadelphia safety composite

Zentis NA - Philadelphia scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2016→2024

Zentis NA - Philadelphia injury rate improved

Zentis NA - Philadelphia's TCR fell 1.6 from 4.4 in 2016 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.93× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.4 · 2017=5.6 · 2018=4.0 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311411 · Philadelphia, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 91% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #2/10
  • PHOTO Citrofrut USA
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~131 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Citrofrut USA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Zentis NA - Philadelphia in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Zentis NA - Philadelphia averages 3.0 TCR (91% of the Frozen fruit and vegetable processing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Zentis NA - Philadelphia TCR series: 2016=4.4 · 2017=5.6 · 2018=4 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Zentis NA - Philadelphia falls in its industry

224 Frozen fruit and vegetable pro establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 10 Frozen fruit and vegetable pro employers in Pennsylvania.

Zentis NA - Philadelphia (131 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 161 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Zentis NA - Philadelphia
Zentis NA - Philadelphia (131 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 161 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Zentis NA - Philadelphia has fewer employees than the Frozen fruit and vegetable processing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 2.8 4 0 0
2023 2.7 2.1 4 0 0
2022 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2021 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2020 3.2 3.2 5 0 0
2018 4.0 4.0 6 0 0
2017 5.6 4.9 8 0 0
2016 4.4 4.4 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311411 · PA · Philadelphia

224 Frozen fruit and vegetable processing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,431 employers in Philadelphia, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Citrofrut USA 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR EVOLUTION FRESH 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oakfield 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR McCain Foods Plant #8 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bazella Group 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harris Masonry, Inc 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE D24 Pittsburgh 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clarion Laminates LLC 131 FTE
CITY-NEAR FIVE BELOW INC 19,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital of University of Pennsylvania 13,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Hospital 9,638 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Campus 9,129 FTE
NAT-TCR Transystems LLC - Twin Falls Project 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Integrity Manufacturing 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ballston Spa 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Star Excavating 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Franciscan Health Care Center 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wilmington 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hawkeye Care Centers of Dubuque LLC 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0662 Washington 131 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.