Radio frequency identification (RFID) devices manufacturing · Washington

Zonar Systems, Inc. - Technology Development Center

Seattle, WA · ~83 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Zonar Systems, Inc. - Technology Development Center runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Radio frequency identification (RFID) devices manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Zonar Systems, Inc. - Technology Development Center: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Radio frequency identification (RFID) devices manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Zonar Systems, Inc. - Technology Development Center safety composite

Zonar Systems, Inc. - Technology Development Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Zonar Systems, Inc. - Technology Development Center held a steady TCR band

Zonar Systems, Inc. - Technology Development Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334419 · Seattle, WA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/4
  • PHOTO Teledyne Mountain View
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Teledyne Mountain View (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Zonar Systems, Inc. - Technology Development Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Zonar Systems, Inc. - Technology Development Center averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Radio frequency identification (RFID) devices manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Zonar Systems, Inc. - Technology Development Center TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Zonar Systems, Inc. - Technology Development Center falls in its industry

334 Radio frequency identification establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 4 Radio frequency identification employers in Washington.

Zonar Systems, Inc. - Technology Development Center (83 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 108 employees and a TCR of 1.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Zonar Systems, Inc. - Technology Development Center
Zonar Systems, Inc. - Technology Development Center (83 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 108 employees and a TCR of 1.8

Zonar Systems, Inc. - Technology Development Center has fewer employees than the Radio frequency identification (RFID) de median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334419 · WA · Seattle

334 Radio frequency identification (RFID) devices manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 1,279 employers in Seattle, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Teledyne Mountain View 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Raytheon_Indianapolis_IN 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kitron Technologies 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Knowles Cazenovia, Inc. 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ocean Peace 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tatoes LLC 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE William Lyon Homes, Inc. - OR Division 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Johansen Construction Company 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Seattle 32,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR The United States of America 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Starz Entertainment 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Medical Center - Montlake and NW 11,307 FTE
NAT-TCR Aviation Other : Virtual Employee Roll-Up Site 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR AZ-01 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CT-02 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NJ-05 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Coast to Coast Logistics LLC 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hc42-442-Westchester Care Center 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE NAPP Timber & Lumber 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE NSK11 - North Sky - Sherwood 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.