State profile · OSHA ITA

Guam workplace safety

How 84 OSHA-reporting employers across Guam compare on workplace injuries, 2016–2024.

84
Employers
3.7
Avg TCR
1,148
Injuries
0
Fatalities

The state picture

Guam's reporting employers average 3.7 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.4 times the ~2.7 all-industry private-sector norm.

3.7
avg TCR · per 100 workers
84
employers reporting
1,148
recordable injuries
0
worker fatalities

State average reflects each state's industry mix. Sort the table below by each employer's own grade against its industry benchmark.

Guam grade distribution 84 graded establishments · width = share

15% of Guam's reporting establishments earn an F and 26% an A, each measured against its own industry benchmark, not the state line. These grades are a transparent derived index, not an official OSHA rating; see the Methodology for the exact formula.

Where Guam ranks among states

54 states & territories by avg TCR

Guam's average TCR of 3.7 is lower than 100% of states, a state average reflects industry mix as much as workplace safety.

Higher avg TCRLower avg TCR

How Guam Workplaces Compare

Guam hosts 84 employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. These are not small shops: federal rules require ITA submission from workplaces with 250+ employees in any industry, plus workplaces with 20+ employees in the roughly 60 NAICS codes classified as high-hazard (construction, manufacturing, healthcare, warehousing, agriculture, and others). Across this Guam cohort, workers have logged 1,148 recordable injuries, producing a state average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 3.7 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year during 2016–2024.

The state has recorded 0 workplace fatalities in the reporting window, which is tracked separately from non-fatal injury counts because fatal events have their own investigation trail under 29 CFR 1904.39. Reading state-level TCR requires context: the headline figure is driven by a state's industry mix. A state with a heavy construction, logging, or meatpacking footprint will mechanically post higher TCR than a state dominated by finance or professional services, even when individual employers are equally well-managed. That is why the employer table below sorts each establishment by its own TCR and letter grade, against the BLS benchmark for its specific industry, not against the state average.

For jobseekers, relocators, investors, and local safety professionals, state-level pages function as an entry point: use the grade-sorted list to spot the safest and highest-risk employers in Guam, then click through to an individual establishment for its year-by-year injury, illness, DART, and fatality trajectory. Compare multiple years before drawing conclusions, a single outlier year can reflect a specific event, whereas a sustained pattern across reporting cycles is a more reliable risk signal. All data comes directly from employer-submitted OSHA Form 300A summaries. State OSHA plans in 22 states operate their own enforcement programs in parallel, but the injury data above is harmonized through the federal ITA system.

Employers in Guam, by injury rate

Page 2 of 2
Employer CityIndustryGradeAvg TCR
Pacific Federal Management, Inc. Tumon Single-family house construc A 0.9
Kinden Corporation Tamuning Electric contracting A 0.9
6022092 - P-290 Earth Covered Magazines Yigo Addition, alteration and ren A 0.8
1710 Tamuning Gu Tamuning Home Centers A 0.7
Pacific Rim Constructors Inc. Dededo Warehouse, industrial, const A 0.7
Fargo Pacific Inc. Tamuning Warehouse, industrial, const A 0.5
104732 - HDOT - Kapalama Wharf & Dredging Honolulu Dredging (e.g., canal, chann A 0.4
Reliable Builders, Inc. Tamuning Commercial building construc A 0.3
GUM Tamuning Express delivery services (e A 0.3
Island Equipment Company Tamuning Gases, industrial (i.e., com C 0.0
Techni-Con, Inc. Tamuning Residential construction, si C 0.0
Gilbane Building Company Guam Hagatna Construction management, com C 0.0
NAPA Route 16 Dededo Automotive parts and supply C 0.0
SODEXO AT GDOE SCHOOLS Zone 2 Hagatna Food Service Contractors C 0.0
SODEXO AT GDOE SCHOOLS Zone 1 Hagatna Food Service Contractors C 0.0
SODEXO AT GDOE SCHOOLS Zone 3 Hagatna Food Service Contractors C 0.0
Sodexo at Guam Doe Schools Hagatna Food Service Contractors C 0.0
J018 Tamuning Addition, alteration and ren C 0.0
SOS Contractor LLC DBA Vertex Guam Tamuning Foundation, building, poured C 0.0
6023104 - P-927 Radio Barrigada Barrigada Addition, alteration and ren C 0.0
Japan Bus Lines, LLC Barrigada City bus services (except mi C 0.0
Guam Ukudu Power Plant Project Dededo Institutional building const C 0.0
6021082 - P-311 Central Fuel Station Dededo Addition, alteration and ren C 0.0
Island CERTS Corporation Tamuning Materials handling equipment C 0.0
Sodexo at Gdoe Schools West Hagatna Food Service Contractors C 0.0
NGDS-A806 Unknown City Aircraft Manufacturing C 0.0
Accomodation and Food services Tumon Hotels (except casino hotels C 0.0
Ross store 497 Tamuning Retail Store C 0.0
Ross store 1902 Dededo Retail Store C 0.0
Sodexo at Gdoe Schools East Hagatna Food Service Contractors C 0.0
Sodexo at Gdoe Schools North Hagatna Food Service Contractors C 0.0
Sodexo at Gdoe Schools South Hagatna Food Service Contractors C 0.0
GUM-ITP Tamuning Aircraft Fuelling C 0.0
HPC Guam Tamuning Commercial and industrial ma C 0.0
← Prev Page 2 of 2
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

What Guam's safety record means for you

Guam averages a TCR of 3.7 - about 1.4× the ~2.7 national private-sector norm. A state average hides wide employer-by-employer variation.

State averages use the credible-subset mean across reporting establishments; they are statistical summaries, not regulatory assessments.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.