State profile · OSHA ITA

Michigan workplace safety

How 16,393 OSHA-reporting employers across Michigan compare on workplace injuries, 2016–2024. Average TCR uses the 14,419 establishments with a credible rate (see methodology).

16,393
Employers
5.3
Avg TCR (rated)
330,220
Injuries (all)
202
Fatalities (all)

TCR, interpreted

Far above average

5.3 avg TCR

Michigan vs all states by OSHA-reporting employer count

Where this state's ITA establishment inventory sits among every tracked state and territory (coverage signal, not a safety ranking)

16,393 9th of 54 higher than 45 of 54 states

States and territories, banded by OSHA ITA reporting employer count

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more states. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source official public datasets · 2026

The state picture

Michigan's 14,419 rated reporting employers average 5.3 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 2.0 times the ~2.7 all-industry private-sector norm.

5.3
avg TCR · rated subset
14,419
rated employers
16,393
all reporting employers
330,220
recordable injuries (all)

Inventory counts and injury/fatality totals cover all 16,393 ITA establishments; the average TCR excludes zero-rate and corrupt-hours filings. See Methodology → Three Populations.

Michigan grade distribution 16,389 graded establishments · width = share

23% of Michigan's reporting establishments earn an F and 16% an A, each measured against its own industry benchmark, not the state line. These grades are a transparent derived index, not an official OSHA rating; see the Methodology for the exact formula.

Where Michigan ranks among states

54 states & territories by avg TCR

Michigan's average TCR of 5.3 is lower than 47% of states, a state average reflects industry mix as much as workplace safety.

Higher avg TCRLower avg TCR

How Michigan Workplaces Compare

Michigan hosts 16,393 employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. These are not small shops: federal rules require ITA submission from workplaces with 250+ employees in any industry, plus workplaces with 20+ employees in the roughly 60 NAICS codes classified as high-hazard (construction, manufacturing, healthcare, warehousing, agriculture, and others). Across this Michigan cohort, workers have logged 330,220 recordable injuries. The published state average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 5.3 injuries per 100 full-time workers uses the 14,419 establishments with a credible rate (zero-rate and corrupt-hours filings stay in the inventory counts above but are excluded from the average, see methodology).

The state has recorded 202 workplace fatalities in the reporting window, which is tracked separately from non-fatal injury counts because fatal events have their own investigation trail under 29 CFR 1904.39. Reading state-level TCR requires context: the headline figure is driven by a state's industry mix. A state with a heavy construction, logging, or meatpacking footprint will mechanically post higher TCR than a state dominated by finance or professional services, even when individual employers are equally well-managed. That is why the employer table below sorts each establishment by its own TCR and letter grade, against the BLS benchmark for its specific industry, not against the state average.

For jobseekers, relocators, investors, and local safety professionals, state-level pages function as an entry point: use the grade-sorted list to spot the safest and highest-risk employers in Michigan, then click through to an individual establishment for its year-by-year injury, illness, DART, and fatality trajectory. Compare multiple years before drawing conclusions, a single outlier year can reflect a specific event, whereas a sustained pattern across reporting cycles is a more reliable risk signal. All data comes directly from employer-submitted OSHA Form 300A summaries. State OSHA plans in 22 states operate their own enforcement programs in parallel, but the injury data above is harmonized through the federal ITA system.

Employers in Michigan, by injury rate

Page 298 of 328
EmployerCityIndustryGradeAvg TCR
Continental - HarmonAuburn HillsPhysical science research anC0.0
Metro Engineering Solutions, LLC.LivoniaEngineering servicesC0.0
ContiTech - Rochester HillsRochester HillsPhysical science research anC0.0
location 32029TroyAutomated data processing seC0.0
Waltonwood University ILRochester Hills-C0.0
Colson GroupSt. JosephCasters, industrial, metal, C0.0
Northland Food and Family Center IncKalkaskaFood (i.e., groceries) storeC0.0
K&K Stamping CompanySt. Clair ShoresBottle caps and tops, metal,C0.0
Painters Supply & Equipment Co. - TaylorTaylorPaints (except artists') merC0.0
Daifuku America CorpNoviBelt conveyor systems manufaC0.0
Lansing 10118LansingPlasma CenterC0.0
TownePlace Suites Ann Arbor MI.Ann ArborHotels (except casino hotelsC0.0
Hilton Garden Inn Ann Arbor MI.Ann ArborHotels (except casino hotelsC0.0
General Fasteners Company- Madison HeightsMadison HeightsBonded warehousing, general C0.0
New BaltimoreNew BaltimoreBulk stations, petroleumC0.0
Vista Springs at Grand RapidsGrand RapidsAssisted-living facilities wC0.0
Vista Springs at HollandHollandAssisted-living facilities wC0.0
2 Gen ManufacturingGrand RapidsMotor vehicle moldings and eC0.0
Ryerson Lansing MichiganLansingMetals service centersC0.0
SA EngineeringLivoniaAssembly plants, passenger cC0.0
AeroMotion NiagaraSaginawMachine shopsC0.0
Precision Vehicle Holdings - CorporateWayneDriving services (e.g., autoC0.0
Bloomfield HillsBloomfield HillsOffice and R and DC0.0
Zimmerman Masonry, Inc.HowellField stone (i.e., masonry) C0.0
Cleaning AuthorityKeego HarborCleaning homesC0.0
Bartec USASterling HeightsMotor vehicle parts and acceC0.0
Klein Cabinets And Interiors IncWestphaliaCabinets, wood built-in, conC0.0
central Concrete Products IncMt PleasantReady-mix concrete manufactuC0.0
VASCOR Budd YardDetroitBridge, tunnel, and highway C0.0
VASCOR Detroit River YardDetroitInspection or weighing serviC0.0
VASCOR Taylor YardTaylorInspection or weighing serviC0.0
JTB Homes LLCWyomingResidential for-sale builderC0.0
Specialty Lifting EquipmentEdmoreForklifts manufacturingC0.0
Decker EquipmentVassarCollector's items, mail-ordeC0.0
Detroit Technical CenterVan Buren TownshipEngineeringC0.0
Superior Floor Coverings, LLCLansingFloor laying, scraping, finiC0.0
Expeditors DTTRomulusAdministrative management seC0.0
Kautex Troy HQTroyGas tanks assembled, automotC0.0
Main Office / ShopTroyMachine shopsC0.0
Kennedy Care ManagementAnn ArborHome health care agenciesC0.0
Belanger - NoviNoviCarwashing machinery manufacC0.0
Michigan Truss AdminCedar SpringsLumber Plywood Millwork and C0.0
Auburn Hills MI YardAuburn HillsOther Building Material DealC0.0
Lapeer MI YardLapeerOther Building Material DealC0.0
44017 - KFC - Front StreetHoughton LakeRestaurants, carryoutC0.0
Auburn Hills HQAuburn HillsMotor vehicle interior systeC0.0
NBSPortageResearch and Development in C0.0
41112 - Bay RdSaginawRestaurants, fast foodC0.0
Taylor Turning Inc.WixomMachine shopsC0.0
Lakeshore Homestead, LLCSouth HavenPacking fruits and vegetableC0.0
← Prev Page 298 of 328 Next →

Nationwide states with similar injury rates or employer scale

Two PlainSafetyScore-derived peer sets for Michigan: nearest states and territories by rated-subset average Total Case Rate and by OSHA-reporting employer inventory. These are cross-state neighborhoods, not the employer list above.

Similar average TCR

Nearest states by rated-subset Total Case Rate (5.3 here).

Similar employer inventory

Nearest states by reporting employer count (16,393 here).

Look up a Michigan employer → · Compare all states → · How TCR is measured →

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.