TCR, interpreted
Far above average
4.6 avg TCR
State profile · OSHA ITA
How 7,610 OSHA-reporting employers across South Carolina compare on workplace injuries, 2016–2024. Average TCR uses the 6,633 establishments with a credible rate (see methodology).
TCR, interpreted
Far above average
4.6 avg TCR
South Carolina vs all states by OSHA-reporting employer count
Where this state's ITA establishment inventory sits among every tracked state and territory (coverage signal, not a safety ranking)
7,610 24th of 54 higher than 30 of 54 states
States and territories, banded by OSHA ITA reporting employer count
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more states. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source official public datasets · 2026
The state picture
South Carolina's 6,633 rated reporting employers average 4.6 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.7 times the ~2.7 all-industry private-sector norm.
Inventory counts and injury/fatality totals cover all 7,610 ITA establishments; the average TCR excludes zero-rate and corrupt-hours filings. See Methodology → Three Populations.
19% of South Carolina's reporting establishments earn an F and 18% an A, each measured against its own industry benchmark, not the state line. These grades are a transparent derived index, not an official OSHA rating; see the Methodology for the exact formula.
South Carolina's average TCR of 4.6 is lower than 79% of states, a state average reflects industry mix as much as workplace safety.
A second cut tells a different story: ranked by rated-subset injury rate alone, South Carolina is #12 of 54. Ranked instead by fatalities per rated employer establishment (same 6,633-employer subset), it's #44 of 54, a 32-place swing. A state can run a moderate everyday injury rate while its rarer, most severe incidents cluster differently; the two metrics measure different things on the same population and shouldn't be read as interchangeable.
South Carolina hosts 7,610 employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. These are not small shops: federal rules require ITA submission from workplaces with 250+ employees in any industry, plus workplaces with 20+ employees in the roughly 60 NAICS codes classified as high-hazard (construction, manufacturing, healthcare, warehousing, agriculture, and others). Across this South Carolina cohort, workers have logged 128,117 recordable injuries. The published state average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 4.6 injuries per 100 full-time workers uses the 6,633 establishments with a credible rate (zero-rate and corrupt-hours filings stay in the inventory counts above but are excluded from the average, see methodology).
The state has recorded 126 workplace fatalities in the reporting window, which is tracked separately from non-fatal injury counts because fatal events have their own investigation trail under 29 CFR 1904.39. Reading state-level TCR requires context: the headline figure is driven by a state's industry mix. A state with a heavy construction, logging, or meatpacking footprint will mechanically post higher TCR than a state dominated by finance or professional services, even when individual employers are equally well-managed. That is why the employer table below sorts each establishment by its own TCR and letter grade, against the BLS benchmark for its specific industry, not against the state average.
For jobseekers, relocators, investors, and local safety professionals, state-level pages function as an entry point: use the grade-sorted list to spot the safest and highest-risk employers in South Carolina, then click through to an individual establishment for its year-by-year injury, illness, DART, and fatality trajectory. Compare multiple years before drawing conclusions, a single outlier year can reflect a specific event, whereas a sustained pattern across reporting cycles is a more reliable risk signal. All data comes directly from employer-submitted OSHA Form 300A summaries. State OSHA plans in 22 states operate their own enforcement programs in parallel, but the injury data above is harmonized through the federal ITA system.
| Employer | City | Industry | Grade | Avg TCR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2068-Piedmont GYN/OB - Rock Hill | Rock Hill | Offices and Clinics of Docto | C | 0.0 |
| 2284-Barnett FP - Carolina Lakes | Indian Land | Offices and Clinics of Docto | C | 0.0 |
| 2376-Rock Hill MOB | Rock Hill | Offices and Clinics of Docto | C | 0.0 |
| Shawmut South Carolina | Lugoff | Textile and Fabric Finishing | C | 0.0 |
| North American Assemblies | Timmonsville | All-terrain vehicles (ATVs), | C | 0.0 |
| Guardian Fence Suppliers of SC Inc | Columbia | Chain link fencing and fence | C | 0.0 |
| Langley Plant | Langley | Acetal resins manufacturing | C | 0.0 |
| AA (Advanced Automation) | Greenville | Semiconductor assembly and p | C | 0.0 |
| Cst Chs | Charleston | General freight trucking, lo | C | 0.0 |
| Hogan / Greenville | Easley | Addition, alteration and ren | C | 0.0 |
| Oconee Nuclear Plant | Seneca | Scaffold erecting and disman | C | 0.0 |
| SC Operations | Sumter | Broiler chicken production | C | 0.0 |
| Northeast Plant | Elgin | Ready-mix concrete manufactu | C | 0.0 |
| Sumter Plant | Sumter | Ready-mix concrete manufactu | C | 0.0 |
| Atkins Energy America - Commercial Services | Columbia | Hazardous waste treatment fa | C | 0.0 |
| Atkins Energy America - Asia Pacific | Columbia | Hazardous waste treatment fa | C | 0.0 |
| Hardeeville Recycling Plant | Hardeeville | Recyclable materials (e.g., | C | 0.0 |
| Unit # 0089 | Rock Hill | Retail | C | 0.0 |
| Unit # 0283 | Sumter | Retail | C | 0.0 |
| Unit # 0808 | Anderson | Retail | C | 0.0 |
| Unit # 1751 | Spartanburg | Retail | C | 0.0 |
| Unit # 1992 | Greenwood | Retail | C | 0.0 |
| Unit # 2152 | Orangeburg | Retail | C | 0.0 |
| Henry Schein Dental Columbia Center | Mount Pleasant | Dental equipment and supplie | C | 0.0 |
| S09343 - WM Lee Station | Belton | - | C | 0.0 |
| Spartanburg Food | Spartanburg | - | C | 0.0 |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation Greenville Campus (1040) | Greenville | - | C | 0.0 |
| Mast General Store - Greenville | Greenville | General stores | C | 0.0 |
| Mast General Store - Colulmbia | Columbia | General stores | C | 0.0 |
| Lewis-Goetz and Company Inc. (Rock Hill) | Rock Hill | - | C | 0.0 |
| 4535-1091 | Rock Hill | Retail/Home Furnishings | C | 0.0 |
| Columbia, Sc (704) | Columbia | - | C | 0.0 |
| Greenville, Sc (705) | Greenville | - | C | 0.0 |
| Clio - 2660 Highway 9 East | Clio | Conveyor and Conveying Equip | C | 0.0 |
| BASF Seneca | Seneca | Other Heavy and Civil Engine | C | 0.0 |
| Ridgeview | Duncan | Machine shops | C | 0.0 |
| SC.GREEN.16 - Ricoh Usa, Inc. | Greenville | Office Equipment | C | 0.0 |
| Piedmont Interstate Fair, Spartanburg, Sc | Spartanburg | - | C | 0.0 |
| Upper S.C. State Fair. | Greenville | - | C | 0.0 |
| Anderson County Dss | Anderson | Individual and family social | - | - |
| Barnwell County Dss | Barnwell | Individual and family social | - | - |
| Cherokee County Dss | Gaffney | Individual and family social | - | - |
| Georgetown Dss | Georgetown | Individual and family social | - | - |
| Upstate Region Child Support Services | Greenville | Individual and family social | - | - |
| Dss State Office | Columbia | Individual and family social | - | - |
| Laurens County Dss | Laurens | Individual and family social | - | - |
| Lexington County Dss | Lexington | Individual and family social | - | - |
| Orangeburg County Dss | Orangeburg | Individual and family social | - | - |
| Richland County Dss | Columbia | Individual and family social | - | - |
| The Seabrook of Hilton Head | Hilton Head | Skilled nursing facilities | - | - |
Two PlainSafetyScore-derived peer sets for South Carolina: nearest states and territories by rated-subset average Total Case Rate and by OSHA-reporting employer inventory. These are cross-state neighborhoods, not the employer list above.
Nearest states by rated-subset Total Case Rate (4.6 here).
Nearest states by reporting employer count (7,610 here).
Look up a South Carolina employer → · Compare all states → · How TCR is measured →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.