Other Airport Operations · New Jersey

00001007 Ewr - 007 Newark Intl Airport

Newark, NJ · ~27 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

00001007 Ewr - 007 Newark Intl Airport runs at 227% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Other Airport Operations workplace, earning a grade F.

00001007 Ewr - 007 Newark Intl Airport: 10.2 TCR = 227% of Other Airport Operations BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

00001007 Ewr - 007 Newark Intl Airport safety composite

00001007 Ewr - 007 Newark Intl Airport scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

00001007 Ewr - 007 Newark Intl Airport: 6.5 → 13.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 13.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.68× in 2024

00001007 Ewr - 007 Newark Intl Airport's TCR rose 7.4 from 6.5 in 2023 to 13.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488119 · Newark, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.2 · 227% of ind

  • DART 7.0 DART
  • RANK #39/43
  • PHOTO 00001009 BWI - 009 B…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 00001009 BWI - 009 BALTIMORE WASHINGTON INTL AIRP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

00001007 Ewr - 007 Newark Intl Airport in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 00001007 Ewr - 007 Newark Intl Airport averages 10.2 TCR (227% of the Other Airport Operations BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

00001007 Ewr - 007 Newark Intl Airport TCR series: 2023=6.5 · 2024=13.9 · BLS 4.5

Where 00001007 Ewr - 007 Newark Intl Airport falls in its industry

1,555 Other Airport Operations establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 43 Other Airport Operations employers in New Jersey.

00001007 Ewr - 007 Newark Intl Airport (27 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate 00001007 Ewr - 007 Newark Intl Airport
00001007 Ewr - 007 Newark Intl Airport (27 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5

00001007 Ewr - 007 Newark Intl Airport has fewer employees than the Other Airport Operations median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.9 7.0 4 0 0
2023 6.5 3.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488119 · NJ · Newark

1,555 Other Airport Operations employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 356 employers in Newark, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 00001009 BWI - 009 BALTIMORE WASHINGTON INTL AIRP 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Swissport Ground Handling - MCO - MCO-GHA 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6957-CHA 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 00001077 VNY - 077 VAN NUYS AIRPORT 10.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE OCEAN SPRAY CRANBERRIES INC. - CHATSWORTH RECEIVING 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Concentric Group LLC 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pact Two, LLC 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Three Bridges-NYST 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWR EWR 13,545 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWR - Airport United Airlines Offices 13,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-EWR 11,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWRPW9829 EWR - NON AA PAX SER 4,772 FTE
NAT-TCR Rice Lake Elementary School 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Mytty Excavating, Inc 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Arcadia at Limerick Pointe 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Gruber Mcneill Contracting, Inc. 10.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mbbs - Murrells Inlet 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eagle Eye Nogales 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bluegrass Truss Company 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pfizer 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.