Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) · Washington

0001 - Seattle Wa Whse

Seattle, WA · ~461 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.8
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

0001 - Seattle Wa Whse runs at 287% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) workplace, earning a grade F.

0001 - Seattle Wa Whse: 9.8 TCR = 287% of Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS 3.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

0001 - Seattle Wa Whse safety composite

0001 - Seattle Wa Whse scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2017→2022

0001 - Seattle Wa Whse injury rate improved

0001 - Seattle Wa Whse's TCR fell 2.9 from 11.1 in 2017 to 8.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.81× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=11.1 · 2018=8.7 · 2019=9.7 · 2020=9.9 · 2021=10.9 · 2022=8.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 455211 · Seattle, WA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.8 · 287% of ind

  • DART 7.9 DART
  • RANK #113/120
  • PHOTO 0652 - MINNEAPOLIS M…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 197 inj
  • SIZE ~461 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 0652 - MINNEAPOLIS MN BUS CTR (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

0001 - Seattle Wa Whse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 0001 - Seattle Wa Whse averages 9.8 TCR (287% of the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

0001 - Seattle Wa Whse TCR series: 2017=11.1 · 2018=8.7 · 2019=9.7 · 2020=9.9 · 2021=10.9 · 2022=8.2 · BLS 3.4

Where 0001 - Seattle Wa Whse falls in its industry

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #113 safest of 120 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an employers in Washington.

0001 - Seattle Wa Whse (461 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 100200300400500600 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate 0001 - Seattle Wa Whse
0001 - Seattle Wa Whse (461 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8

0001 - Seattle Wa Whse has more employees than the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 8.2 7.9 28 0 0
2021 10.9 7.9 36 0 0
2020 9.9 8.7 34 0 0
2019 9.7 9.1 33 0 0
2018 8.7 8.4 30 0 0
2017 11.1 8.6 36 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

455211 · WA · Seattle

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 1,279 employers in Seattle, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 0652 - MINNEAPOLIS MN BUS CTR 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 25320321 HYANNIS, MA 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0564 - HAWTHORNE CA BUS CTR 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0673 - HENDERSON NV WHSE 9.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Yakima 462 FTE
STATE-SIZE DigiPen Redmond 462 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valley Cities Counseling and Consultation - Outpatient 462 FTE
STATE-SIZE Skagit Valley Casino Resort 460 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Seattle 32,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR The United States of America 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Starz Entertainment 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Medical Center - Montlake and NW 11,307 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 1906 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Effingham Fire Department 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Head Start 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR The Chelsea at Manalapan 9.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE College Hospital 461 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mansfield Industrial Inc. 461 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nissin Foods Lancaster 461 FTE
NAT-SIZE NYSEG Kirckwood JACC 461 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.