Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) · Utah

0113 - Salt Lake City Ut Whse

Salt Lake City, UT · ~493 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.2
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

0113 - Salt Lake City Ut Whse runs at 212% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) workplace, earning a grade F.

0113 - Salt Lake City Ut Whse: 7.2 TCR = 212% of Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS 3.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

0113 - Salt Lake City Ut Whse safety composite

0113 - Salt Lake City Ut Whse scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

0113 - Salt Lake City Ut Whse: 5.8 → 8.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 8.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.18× in 2022

0113 - Salt Lake City Ut Whse's TCR rose 2.6 from 5.8 in 2017 to 8.5 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 455211 · Salt Lake City, UT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.2 · 212% of ind

  • DART 8.5 DART
  • RANK #23/26
  • PHOTO 701-00023
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 153 inj
  • SIZE ~493 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 701-00023 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

0113 - Salt Lake City Ut Whse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 0113 - Salt Lake City Ut Whse averages 7.2 TCR (212% of the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

0113 - Salt Lake City Ut Whse TCR series: 2017=5.8 · 2018=6 · 2019=6.8 · 2020=7.9 · 2021=8.2 · 2022=8.5 · BLS 3.4

Where 0113 - Salt Lake City Ut Whse falls in its industry

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 26 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an employers in Utah.

0113 - Salt Lake City Ut Whse (493 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 100200300400500600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate 0113 - Salt Lake City Ut Whse
0113 - Salt Lake City Ut Whse (493 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8

0113 - Salt Lake City Ut Whse has more employees than the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 8.5 8.5 31 0 0
2021 8.2 7.9 29 0 0
2020 7.9 7.1 29 0 0
2019 6.8 6.5 24 0 0
2018 6.0 5.7 21 0 0
2017 5.8 5.2 19 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

455211 · UT · Salt Lake City

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 998 employers in Salt Lake City, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 701-00023 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2532-25320066 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0464 - SOUTH SACRAMENTO CA WHSE 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0563 - LAS VEGAS NV BUS CTR 7.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pepperidge Farm Richmond 492 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ultradent Products Inc - Building 1 491 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bard Access Systems 491 FTE
STATE-SIZE SelectHealth Franklin Building 496 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - SLC 4,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR PC - Primary Childrens Hospital 3,254 FTE
CITY-NEAR L3 Technologies, Inc. 3,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salt Lake City Terminal 2,766 FTE
NAT-TCR 0464 - South Sacramento Ca Whse 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Las Cruces 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Vibra-Pro 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Clinton Memorial Hospital 7.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wegmans King Of Prussia 048 493 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZCAM 493 FTE
NAT-SIZE Division 23 University of Rochester 493 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mando America Corporation 493 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.