Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) · Maryland

0208 - White Marsh Md Whse

Baltimore, MD · ~222 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

0208 - White Marsh Md Whse runs at 145% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) workplace, earning a grade D.

0208 - White Marsh Md Whse: 4.9 TCR = 145% of Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS 3.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

0208 - White Marsh Md Whse safety composite

0208 - White Marsh Md Whse scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

0208 - White Marsh Md Whse: 5.3 → 5.7 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 8.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.03× in 2022

0208 - White Marsh Md Whse's TCR rose 0.4 from 5.3 in 2017 to 5.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.03× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 455211 · Baltimore, MD ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.9 · 145% of ind

  • DART 5.1 DART
  • RANK #12/30
  • PHOTO 2532-25320365
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 47 inj
  • SIZE ~222 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2532-25320365 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

0208 - White Marsh Md Whse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 0208 - White Marsh Md Whse averages 4.9 TCR (145% of the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

0208 - White Marsh Md Whse TCR series: 2017=5.3 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=8.1 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=5.7 · BLS 3.4

Where 0208 - White Marsh Md Whse falls in its industry

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 30 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an employers in Maryland.

0208 - White Marsh Md Whse (222 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 100200300400500600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate 0208 - White Marsh Md Whse
0208 - White Marsh Md Whse (222 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8

0208 - White Marsh Md Whse has fewer employees than the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 5.7 5.1 10 0 0
2021 3.6 3.0 6 0 0
2020 4.3 4.3 7 0 0
2019 8.1 7.4 12 0 0
2018 2.6 2.6 4 0 0
2017 5.3 4.6 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

455211 · MD · Baltimore

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 1,031 employers in Baltimore, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2532-25320365 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0132 - VALLEJO CA WHSE 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0490 - NORTH PHOENIX AZ WHSE 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 701-00667 4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE K&L Microwave 222 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fila USA, Inc. Brandon Woods Distribution Center 222 FTE
STATE-SIZE White Marsh 091 222 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1890 - Prince Georges Plaza 222 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johns Hopkins Hospital 12,523 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Maryland Medical Center 7,980 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sinai Hospital of Baltimore 7,770 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGMS-T340 6,180 FTE
NAT-TCR 0490 - North Phoenix Az Whse 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 0132 - Vallejo Ca Whse 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Valehaven HFA 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Stew Leonard's Yonkers, LLC 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 0628 - Grafton Wi Whse 222 FTE
NAT-SIZE 17 Oakwood 222 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Florida Shipyards, Inc. 222 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wal*Mart Return: Johnstown. (SMRU0217) 222 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.