General medical and surgical hospitals · Maryland

Johns Hopkins Hospital

Baltimore, MD · ~12,523 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Johns Hopkins Hospital runs at 50% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General medical and surgical hospitals workplace, earning a grade A.

Johns Hopkins Hospital: 3.7 TCR = 50% of General medical and surgical hospitals BLS 7.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Johns Hopkins Hospital safety composite

Johns Hopkins Hospital scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Johns Hopkins Hospital held a steady TCR band

Johns Hopkins Hospital's TCR held near 0.2 from 4.1 in 2017 to 4.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.1 · 2018=4.4 · 2020=3.8 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Baltimore, MD AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 3.7 · 50% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #18/70
  • PHOTO Avera Flandreau Hosp…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 3,101 inj
  • SIZE ~12,523 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Avera Flandreau Hospital (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Johns Hopkins Hospital in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Johns Hopkins Hospital averages 3.7 TCR (50% of the General medical and surgical hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Johns Hopkins Hospital TCR series: 2017=4.1 · 2018=4.4 · 2020=3.8 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=4.3 · BLS 7.5

Where Johns Hopkins Hospital falls in its industry

6,862 General medical and surgical h establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 70 General medical and surgical h employers in Maryland.

Johns Hopkins Hospital (12,523 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05,00010,00015,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Johns Hopkins Hospital
Johns Hopkins Hospital (12,523 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Johns Hopkins Hospital has more employees than the General medical and surgical hospitals median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.3 2.4 475 6 0
2023 2.7 1.4 452 6 0
2022 3.1 1.7 510 9 0
2020 3.8 2.4 518 134 0
2018 4.4 2.0 634 7 0
2017 4.1 1.9 512 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · MD · Baltimore

6,862 General medical and surgical hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 1,031 employers in Baltimore, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Avera Flandreau Hospital 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Saint Alphonsus Medical Center Ontario-SAHS-ID/OR 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nacogdoches Memorial Hospital 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Licking Memorial Hospital 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE University of Maryland Medical Center 7,980 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sinai Hospital of Baltimore 7,770 FTE
STATE-SIZE NGMS-T340 6,180 FTE
STATE-SIZE Red Coats, Inc. 6,040 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : BWI2 4,646 FTE
CITY-NEAR MD-02 4,581 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company 4,437 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BWI2 4,398 FTE
NAT-TCR owens electric co 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR S08486 - NW Regional MRF 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Filtros Limited 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR The Hand Family Beverage 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Forest River, Inc. 12,549 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oregon State University 12,573 FTE
NAT-SIZE UMass Memorial Health 12,452 FTE
NAT-SIZE FCA US Headquarters and Technology 12,609 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.