Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) · New York

0243 - Queens Ny Whse

Long Island City, NY · ~273 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.1
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

0243 - Queens Ny Whse runs at 384% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) workplace, earning a grade F.

0243 - Queens Ny Whse: 13.1 TCR = 384% of Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS 3.4 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

0243 - Queens Ny Whse safety composite

0243 - Queens Ny Whse scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2017→2022

0243 - Queens Ny Whse injury rate improved

0243 - Queens Ny Whse's TCR fell 0.4 from 11.3 in 2017 to 11.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 16.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=11.3 · 2018=16.9 · 2019=16.9 · 2020=9.2 · 2022=11.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 455211 · Long Island City, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 13.1 · 384% of ind

  • DART 10.5 DART
  • RANK #108/110
  • PHOTO 0321 - YONKERS NY WHSE
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 123 inj
  • SIZE ~273 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 0321 - YONKERS NY WHSE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

0243 - Queens Ny Whse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 0243 - Queens Ny Whse averages 13.1 TCR (384% of the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

0243 - Queens Ny Whse TCR series: 2017=11.3 · 2018=16.9 · 2019=16.9 · 2020=9.2 · 2022=11 · BLS 3.4

Where 0243 - Queens Ny Whse falls in its industry

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #108 safest of 110 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an employers in New York.

0243 - Queens Ny Whse (273 employees, TCR 13.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 100200300400500600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 0243 - Queens Ny Whse
0243 - Queens Ny Whse (273 employees, TCR 13.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8

0243 - Queens Ny Whse has more employees than the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 11.0 10.5 22 0 0
2020 9.2 6.2 18 0 0
2019 16.9 14.8 30 2 0
2018 16.9 14.2 32 0 0
2017 11.3 9.7 21 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

455211 · NY · Long Island City

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 160 employers in Long Island City, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 0321 - YONKERS NY WHSE 13.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1062 - MANHATTAN NY WHSE 13.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0578 - SAN DIEGO CA BUS CTR 13.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0115 - LYNNWOOD WA BUS CTR 12.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE STATEN ISLAND SERVICE CENTER (NY78) 273 FTE
STATE-SIZE Big Heart Pet Brands 273 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1866 - Farmingdale 273 FTE
STATE-SIZE NORTHWEST ROCHESTER_1432967 273 FTE
CITY-NEAR Collins Building Services 3,480 FTE
CITY-NEAR Long Island City Facility 2,244 FTE
CITY-NEAR New York City Department of Design & Construction 1,034 FTE
CITY-NEAR E-J Electric Installation Co. 1,006 FTE
NAT-TCR Salem Crossing 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR COD012 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 114050-Homestead Po 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 335926-Nbg-Woodcliff Sta 13.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 0370 - Merrillville in Whse 273 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZMIN 273 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZRAL 273 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZSTF 273 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.