Electric Power Transmission, Control, and Distribution · Missouri

030 - Distribution Operating - Missouri

St. Louis, MO · ~168 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

030 - Distribution Operating - Missouri runs at 148% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electric Power Transmission, Control, and Distribution workplace, earning a grade D.

030 - Distribution Operating - Missouri: 1.8 TCR = 148% of Electric Power Transmission, Control, and Distribution BLS 1.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

030 - Distribution Operating - Missouri safety composite

030 - Distribution Operating - Missouri scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

030 - Distribution Operating - Missouri held a steady TCR band

030 - Distribution Operating - Missouri's TCR held near 0.0 from 1.8 in 2022 to 1.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=1.8 · 2023=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · St. Louis, MO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 1.8 · 148% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #21/127
  • PHOTO CHUCKATUCK
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~168 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CHUCKATUCK (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

030 - Distribution Operating - Missouri in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 030 - Distribution Operating - Missouri averages 1.8 TCR (148% of the Electric Power Transmission, Control, and Distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

030 - Distribution Operating - Missouri TCR series: 2022=1.8 · 2023=1.8 · BLS 1.2

Where 030 - Distribution Operating - Missouri falls in its industry

2,958 Electric Power Transmission, C establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 127 Electric Power Transmission, C employers in Missouri.

030 - Distribution Operating - Missouri (168 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 030 - Distribution Operating - Missouri
030 - Distribution Operating - Missouri (168 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

030 - Distribution Operating - Missouri has more employees than the Electric Power Transmission, Control, an median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.8 1.8 3 0 0
2022 1.8 1.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · MO · St. Louis

2,958 Electric Power Transmission, Control, and Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 686 employers in St. Louis, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CHUCKATUCK 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bailey County Electric Cooperative 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parke County Rural Electric Membership Corporation 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brunswick Electric Membership Cooperative-3 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Overhead Door Company of St. Louis - Lackland 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willert Home Products, Inc. 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wilson Manufacturing Company 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2689_5126 168 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monsanto - St. Louis 6,028 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony's Medical Center 3,706 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABI Corporation 2,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Louis University Hospital 2,084 FTE
NAT-TCR Alpine Meadows Assisted Living 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hilex Poly - Milesburg 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (ELP-6319) 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cortez Location 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Evergreen Packaging - Cedar Rapids 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Loftin Equipment Company Headquarters 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE 10420 Indian School Plaza (WO) 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE 700 S. Pearl St - Main Building 168 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.