Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) · New York

0326 - Port Chester Ny Whse

Port Chester, NY · ~228 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

0326 - Port Chester Ny Whse runs at 121% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) workplace, earning a grade D.

0326 - Port Chester Ny Whse: 4.1 TCR = 121% of Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS 3.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

0326 - Port Chester Ny Whse safety composite

0326 - Port Chester Ny Whse scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.2

2016→2022

0326 - Port Chester Ny Whse injury rate improved

0326 - Port Chester Ny Whse's TCR fell 5.2 from 8.5 in 2016 to 3.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.5 · 2017=6.1 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 455211 · Port Chester, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.1 · 121% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #22/110
  • PHOTO 25320022 PHILADELPHI…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 47 inj
  • SIZE ~228 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 25320022 PHILADELPHIA, PA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

0326 - Port Chester Ny Whse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 0326 - Port Chester Ny Whse averages 4.1 TCR (121% of the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

0326 - Port Chester Ny Whse TCR series: 2016=8.5 · 2017=6.1 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=3.4 · BLS 3.4

Where 0326 - Port Chester Ny Whse falls in its industry

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 110 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an employers in New York.

0326 - Port Chester Ny Whse (228 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 100200300400500600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate 0326 - Port Chester Ny Whse
0326 - Port Chester Ny Whse (228 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8

0326 - Port Chester Ny Whse has fewer employees than the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.4 0.0 6 0 0
2021 4.6 2.3 8 0 0
2020 3.9 3.9 7 0 0
2019 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2018 1.8 1.8 2 1 0
2017 6.1 5.5 9 1 0
2016 8.5 7.3 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

455211 · NY · Port Chester

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 23 employers in Port Chester, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 25320022 PHILADELPHIA, PA 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 25320122 WARRENSVILLE HEIGHTS, OH 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 014-00938 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 701-00355 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE 110 228 FTE
STATE-SIZE RemArms, LLC 228 FTE
STATE-SIZE Owens Illinois 228 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 2916 228 FTE
CITY-NEAR 10483 Port Chester 237 FTE
CITY-NEAR THE ENCLAVE AT RYE REHABILIATION & NURSING CENTER 217 FTE
CITY-NEAR J.J. Cassone Bakery, Inc. 195 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3399 - Port Chester 187 FTE
NAT-TCR DBK Inc 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Anderson Foam Fab 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Engineered Air 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Desert Springs Hospitals 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1175 - Cumming Ga Whse 228 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1183 - Mishawaka in Whse 228 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0307 - Nashua Nh Whse 228 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZNCA 228 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.