Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) · Indiana

1183 - Mishawaka in Whse

Granger, IN · ~228 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

1183 - Mishawaka in Whse runs at 133% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) workplace, earning a grade D.

1183 - Mishawaka in Whse: 4.5 TCR = 133% of Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS 3.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

1183 - Mishawaka in Whse safety composite

1183 - Mishawaka in Whse scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2016→2022

1183 - Mishawaka in Whse injury rate improved

1183 - Mishawaka in Whse's TCR fell 3.3 from 5.0 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.0 · 2017=5.5 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=6.3 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 455211 · Granger, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.5 · 133% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #45/52
  • PHOTO 1287 - CENTRAL POINT…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 53 inj
  • SIZE ~228 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1287 - CENTRAL POINT OR WHSE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

1183 - Mishawaka in Whse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 1183 - Mishawaka in Whse averages 4.5 TCR (133% of the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

1183 - Mishawaka in Whse TCR series: 2016=5 · 2017=5.5 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=6.3 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=1.8 · BLS 3.4

Where 1183 - Mishawaka in Whse falls in its industry

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #45 safest of 52 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an employers in Indiana.

1183 - Mishawaka in Whse (228 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 100200300400500600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate 1183 - Mishawaka in Whse
1183 - Mishawaka in Whse (228 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8

1183 - Mishawaka in Whse has fewer employees than the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.8 1.8 4 0 0
2021 5.1 4.6 10 0 0
2020 6.3 4.0 11 0 0
2019 3.6 1.8 6 0 0
2018 4.3 3.1 7 0 0
2017 5.5 3.4 8 0 0
2016 5.0 3.6 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

455211 · IN · Granger

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 30 employers in Granger, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1287 - CENTRAL POINT OR WHSE 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0317 - LANCASTER PA WHSE 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 660-00627 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 705-00212 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Support Service Center 228 FTE
STATE-SIZE Office 228 FTE
STATE-SIZE General Stamping & Metalworks - South Bend 228 FTE
STATE-SIZE Task Force Tips LLC 228 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1445 - Mishawaka 313 FTE
CITY-NEAR ITR Concession Company, LLC. 288 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2325 MARTINS SUPERMARKET 249 FTE
CITY-NEAR Allegiance Staffing CORP 239 FTE
NAT-TCR 0317 - Lancaster Pa Whse 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 1287 - Central Point or Whse 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR HCW 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 42939 - Cleveland Joint Fac. 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1175 - Cumming Ga Whse 228 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0326 - Port Chester Ny Whse 228 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0307 - Nashua Nh Whse 228 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZNCA 228 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.