Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) · Indiana

0347 - Fortune Park in Whse

Indianapolis, IN · ~277 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

0347 - Fortune Park in Whse runs at 126% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) workplace, earning a grade D.

0347 - Fortune Park in Whse: 4.3 TCR = 126% of Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS 3.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

0347 - Fortune Park in Whse safety composite

0347 - Fortune Park in Whse scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

0347 - Fortune Park in Whse: 4.5 → 5.2 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 6.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.99× in 2022

0347 - Fortune Park in Whse's TCR rose 0.7 from 4.5 in 2016 to 5.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 455211 · Indianapolis, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 126% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #43/52
  • PHOTO 705-00872
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 57 inj
  • SIZE ~277 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 705-00872 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

0347 - Fortune Park in Whse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 0347 - Fortune Park in Whse averages 4.3 TCR (126% of the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

0347 - Fortune Park in Whse TCR series: 2016=4.5 · 2017=6.5 · 2018=6 · 2019=5.4 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=5.2 · BLS 3.4

Where 0347 - Fortune Park in Whse falls in its industry

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #43 safest of 52 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an employers in Indiana.

0347 - Fortune Park in Whse (277 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 100200300400500600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate 0347 - Fortune Park in Whse
0347 - Fortune Park in Whse (277 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8

0347 - Fortune Park in Whse has more employees than the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 5.2 4.2 11 0 0
2021 0.9 0.0 1 1 0
2020 1.4 0.9 3 0 0
2019 5.4 5.4 11 0 0
2018 6.0 3.0 11 1 0
2017 6.5 5.4 12 0 0
2016 4.5 4.5 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

455211 · IN · Indianapolis

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 705-00872 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 25320393 WARWICK, RI 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 701-00660 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 25320047 FRAMINGHAM, MA 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE 1329 277 FTE
STATE-SIZE 134 - Southport Rd Indianapolis 277 FTE
STATE-SIZE AES Indiana - Petersburg 276 FTE
STATE-SIZE Herff Jones - Indy 278 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 1737 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Dymotek - Ellington 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR RYE-RYMS 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ft Worth Purina Distribution Center 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1106 - Pittsfield Township Mi Whse 277 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0067 - Missoula Mt Whse 277 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1022 - Parker Co Whse 277 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1178 - Timnath Co Whse 277 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.