Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) · South Carolina

0360 - Charleston Sc Whse

Charleston, SC · ~269 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.1
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

0360 - Charleston Sc Whse runs at 239% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) workplace, earning a grade F.

0360 - Charleston Sc Whse: 8.1 TCR = 239% of Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS 3.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

0360 - Charleston Sc Whse safety composite

0360 - Charleston Sc Whse scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2017→2022

0360 - Charleston Sc Whse injury rate improved

0360 - Charleston Sc Whse's TCR fell 2.2 from 7.9 in 2017 to 5.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 10.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.9 · 2018=10.7 · 2019=10.8 · 2020=7.2 · 2021=6.4 · 2022=5.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 455211 · Charleston, SC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.1 · 239% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #5/5
  • PHOTO 0623 - ROYAL PALM BE…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 96 inj
  • SIZE ~269 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 0623 - ROYAL PALM BEACH FL WHSE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

0360 - Charleston Sc Whse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 0360 - Charleston Sc Whse averages 8.1 TCR (239% of the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

0360 - Charleston Sc Whse TCR series: 2017=7.9 · 2018=10.7 · 2019=10.8 · 2020=7.2 · 2021=6.4 · 2022=5.7 · BLS 3.4

Where 0360 - Charleston Sc Whse falls in its industry

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 5 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an employers in South Carolina.

0360 - Charleston Sc Whse (269 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 100200300400500600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate 0360 - Charleston Sc Whse
0360 - Charleston Sc Whse (269 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8

0360 - Charleston Sc Whse has more employees than the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 5.7 5.2 12 0 0
2021 6.4 5.4 13 0 0
2020 7.2 4.1 14 0 0
2019 10.8 10.2 20 0 0
2018 10.7 9.7 21 0 0
2017 7.9 7.4 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

455211 · SC · Charleston

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 341 employers in Charleston, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 0623 - ROYAL PALM BEACH FL WHSE 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2532-25320320 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1207 - TULSA OK WHSE 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0483 - SOUTHEAST SAN DIEGO CA WHSE 8.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Landmark Construction 269 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Greenville Plant (DGV) 269 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carolina International Trucks 269 FTE
STATE-SIZE Child Nutrition 269 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical University Hospital Authority 8,204 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical University of South Carolina 5,881 FTE
CITY-NEAR SC-03 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAFETY MANAGEMENT DIVISION 1,790 FTE
NAT-TCR 0623 - Royal Palm Beach Fl Whse 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR buybuy Baby Livingston 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Main 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Hunter Truck - Pocono 8.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 0681 - Austin Tx Whse 269 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZSPR 269 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4168-Bayer Luling 269 FTE
NAT-SIZE Construction Innovations 269 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.