Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) · Texas

0681 - Austin Tx Whse

Austin, TX · ~269 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

0681 - Austin Tx Whse runs at 149% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) workplace, earning a grade D.

0681 - Austin Tx Whse: 5.1 TCR = 149% of Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS 3.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

0681 - Austin Tx Whse safety composite

0681 - Austin Tx Whse scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.9

2016→2022

0681 - Austin Tx Whse injury rate improved

0681 - Austin Tx Whse's TCR fell 4.9 from 7.6 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 14.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.6 · 2017=14.0 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=2.0 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 455211 · Austin, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.1 · 149% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #17/33
  • PHOTO 25320001 MEDFORD, MA
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 74 inj
  • SIZE ~269 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 25320001 MEDFORD, MA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

0681 - Austin Tx Whse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 0681 - Austin Tx Whse averages 5.1 TCR (149% of the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

0681 - Austin Tx Whse TCR series: 2016=7.6 · 2017=14 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=2 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=2.7 · BLS 3.4

Where 0681 - Austin Tx Whse falls in its industry

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 33 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an employers in Texas.

0681 - Austin Tx Whse (269 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 100200300400500600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate 0681 - Austin Tx Whse
0681 - Austin Tx Whse (269 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8

0681 - Austin Tx Whse has more employees than the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.7 1.8 6 0 0
2021 2.9 1.0 6 0 0
2020 2.5 2.0 5 0 0
2019 2.0 2.0 4 0 0
2018 3.8 2.9 8 0 0
2017 14.0 14.0 29 1 0
2016 7.6 7.2 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

455211 · TX · Austin

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 25320001 MEDFORD, MA 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 701-00224 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 25320054 PEMBROKE PINES, FL 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 25320232 JOHNSON CITY, NY 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE James Construction Group LLC -Houston, Tx 269 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ragle Construction 269 FTE
STATE-SIZE W.O.E. CONSTRUCTION 269 FTE
STATE-SIZE Critical Electric Systems Group 269 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR PHS - Timber Hills 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Birkey'S Farm Store, Inc. - Polo 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bed Bath and Beyond Columbus OH 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR buybuy Baby Tulsa 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 0360 - Charleston Sc Whse 269 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4168-Bayer Luling 269 FTE
NAT-SIZE Construction Innovations 269 FTE
NAT-SIZE SCHOTT Gemtron 269 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.