Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) · Minnesota

0377 - St Louis Park Mn Whse

St Louis Park, MN · ~351 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

0377 - St Louis Park Mn Whse runs at 118% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) workplace, earning a grade C.

0377 - St Louis Park Mn Whse: 4.0 TCR = 118% of Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS 3.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

0377 - St Louis Park Mn Whse safety composite

0377 - St Louis Park Mn Whse scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

0377 - St Louis Park Mn Whse held a steady TCR band

0377 - St Louis Park Mn Whse's TCR held near 0.3 from 4.6 in 2017 to 4.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.89× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.6 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=4.0 · 2022=4.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 455211 · St Louis Park, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.0 · 118% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #2/9
  • PHOTO 25320061 OWINGS MILL…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 59 inj
  • SIZE ~351 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 25320061 OWINGS MILLS, MD (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

0377 - St Louis Park Mn Whse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 0377 - St Louis Park Mn Whse averages 4.0 TCR (118% of the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

0377 - St Louis Park Mn Whse TCR series: 2017=4.6 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=4 · 2022=4.4 · BLS 3.4

Where 0377 - St Louis Park Mn Whse falls in its industry

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 9 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an employers in Minnesota.

0377 - St Louis Park Mn Whse (351 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 100200300400500600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate 0377 - St Louis Park Mn Whse
0377 - St Louis Park Mn Whse (351 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8

0377 - St Louis Park Mn Whse has more employees than the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.4 3.6 11 0 0
2021 4.0 4.0 10 0 0
2020 3.9 2.7 10 0 0
2019 2.4 2.4 6 0 0
2018 4.8 4.0 11 1 0
2017 4.6 3.4 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

455211 · MN · St Louis Park

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 57 employers in St Louis Park, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 25320061 OWINGS MILLS, MD 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2532-25320210 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1031 - MANTECA CA WHSE 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 294 - Escanaba MI 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Trident Seafoods- Motley 351 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1633 351 FTE
STATE-SIZE Herndon 351 FTE
STATE-SIZE Polk County-All Locations 351 FTE
CITY-NEAR PNMH ST LOUIS PARK METHODIST HOSP 2,916 FTE
CITY-NEAR PN1N ST LOUIS PARK 3800 BLDG 670 FTE
CITY-NEAR city of st. louis park 510 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northland Aluminum Products, Inc 444 FTE
NAT-TCR Royal Envelope Corporation 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Bed Bath and Beyond Riverside 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Coosemans Tampa Inc 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 20275 - Parkville 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 0691 - Avondale Az Whse 351 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bumble Bee Seafoods - Santa Fe Springs 351 FTE
NAT-SIZE Deerfield Correctional Complex 351 FTE
NAT-SIZE PCI Bay Area Interior 351 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.