Correctional institutions · Minnesota

Minnesota Correctional Facility-Moose Lake

Moose Lake, MN · ~351 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Minnesota Correctional Facility-Moose Lake runs at 218% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Correctional institutions workplace, earning a grade F.

Minnesota Correctional Facility-Moose Lake: 7.0 TCR = 218% of Correctional institutions BLS 3.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Minnesota Correctional Facility-Moose Lake safety composite

Minnesota Correctional Facility-Moose Lake scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Minnesota Correctional Facility-Moose Lake held a steady TCR band

Minnesota Correctional Facility-Moose Lake's TCR held near 0.3 from 1.6 in 2017 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 30.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.6 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=30.6 · 2021=12.7 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922140 · Moose Lake, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.0 · 218% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #20/32
  • PHOTO Maryland Correctiona…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~351 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Maryland Correctional Institution - Women (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Minnesota Correctional Facility-Moose Lake in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Minnesota Correctional Facility-Moose Lake averages 7.0 TCR (218% of the Correctional institutions BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Minnesota Correctional Facility-Moose Lake TCR series: 2017=1.6 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=30.6 · 2021=12.7 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 3.2

Where Minnesota Correctional Facility-Moose Lake falls in its industry

482 Correctional institutions establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 32 Correctional institutions employers in Minnesota.

Minnesota Correctional Facility-Moose Lake (351 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Minnesota Correctional Facility-Moose Lake
Minnesota Correctional Facility-Moose Lake (351 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Minnesota Correctional Facility-Moose Lake has more employees than the Correctional institutions median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 1.6 5 1 0
2023 2.9 1.9 7 2 0
2022 1.3 1.0 4 0 0
2021 12.7 12.7 3 34 0
2020 30.6 30.6 3 89 0
2019 1.6 1.3 5 0 0
2018 3.2 2.9 9 1 0
2017 1.6 1.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922140 · MN · Moose Lake

482 Correctional institutions employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 13 employers in Moose Lake, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Maryland Correctional Institution - Women 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Federal Correctional Institution - Staff and Inmates 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eastern Correctional Institution 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Green Rock Correctional Center 6.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Trident Seafoods- Motley 351 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1633 351 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0377 - ST LOUIS PARK MN WHSE 351 FTE
STATE-SIZE Herndon 351 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN Sex Offender Program - Moose Lake 482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Essentia Health Moose Lake Hospital 225 FTE
CITY-NEAR Moose Lake Mercy Campus 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR Augustana Mercy 129 FTE
NAT-TCR James L Maher Center 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR VIC 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Iowa City Ready Mix, Inc. 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rocky Hill Store 7.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Branch 420 351 FTE
NAT-SIZE MBM-6 Texas 351 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clearwater Paper Cypress Bend 351 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lakewood 351 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.