Mail and Parcel Delivery · California

056463-Ric-El Sobrante Br

Richmond, CA · ~29 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
21.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

056463-Ric-El Sobrante Br runs at 478% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Mail and Parcel Delivery workplace, earning a grade F.

056463-Ric-El Sobrante Br: 21.5 TCR = 478% of Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

056463-Ric-El Sobrante Br safety composite

056463-Ric-El Sobrante Br scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 21.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 21.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

056463-Ric-El Sobrante Br: 15.8 → 21.4 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 41.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.99× in 2022

056463-Ric-El Sobrante Br's TCR rose 5.6 from 15.8 in 2017 to 21.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 41.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 491110 · Richmond, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 21.5 · 478% of ind

  • DART 21.4 DART
  • RANK #1229/1240
  • PHOTO 230412-BAL-HAMILTON …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 230412-BAL-HAMILTON STA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

056463-Ric-El Sobrante Br in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 056463-Ric-El Sobrante Br averages 21.5 TCR (478% of the Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

056463-Ric-El Sobrante Br TCR series: 2017=15.8 · 2018=41.5 · 2019=7.4 · 2022=21.4 · BLS 4.5

Where 056463-Ric-El Sobrante Br falls in its industry

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1229 safest of 1240 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers in California.

056463-Ric-El Sobrante Br (29 employees, TCR 21.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 056463-Ric-El Sobrante Br
056463-Ric-El Sobrante Br (29 employees, TCR 21.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8

056463-Ric-El Sobrante Br has fewer employees than the Mail and Parcel Delivery median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 21.4 21.4 6 0 0
2019 7.4 7.4 2 0 0
2018 41.5 41.5 12 1 0
2017 15.8 15.8 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

491110 · CA · Richmond

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 158 employers in Richmond, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 230412-BAL-HAMILTON STA 21.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 284231-KCM-JAMES CREWS STA 21.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 161568-CHI-NANCY B JEFFERSON STA 21.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 287186-STL-GAFFNEY BR 21.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sean V. Doherty Farms 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blanco Farms, LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SHOP 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cottonwood Farms 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 134 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 635 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 147 2,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 105 2,724 FTE
NAT-TCR Pacific Tomato Growers, Ltd. - Farm Direct 21.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Alan Kunsman Roofing & Siding, Inc. 21.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Med Center EMS 21.5 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Little Falls 21.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 400944-Boring Po 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE 407360-Saint Helens Po 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE 409328-Wilsonville Po 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE 549030-Washougal Po 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.